Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
23
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 59.1% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2023 26 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 75.5% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 262.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 11.3% 45 Fragile Recovery
2019 41 Fragile Recovery
2018 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 41 Fragile Recovery
2015 39 Fragile Recovery
2014 27.7% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 47 Fragile Recovery
2012 39 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Joshua Habermann Artistic Director 45.8% of Rev
Alicia Scanlan Board Member 13.3% of Rev
KeAli'i Becera Board President
Sally Hattemer Treasurer
Phil Verhoef Board President
Diane Koshi Secretary
Stephanie Bowles Board Member
Robert Kessner Board Member
Rose Wall Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Joshua Habermann Artistic Director 48.7% of Rev
Jacquelyn Kimbro Executive Director 6.3% of Rev
Holly Pippin Board Member 6.3% of Rev
Stephanie Morem Bowles Board President
Sally Hattemer Treasurer
KeAli'i Becera Board President
Amy Akana Secretary
Phil Verhoef Board Member
Robert Kessner Board Member
Chris Bayot Board Member
Kathryn Russell Board Member
Elizabeth Flint Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Joshua Habermann Artistic Director 40.9% of Rev
Jacquelyn Kimbro Executive Director 12.6% of Rev
Stephanie Morem Board President
Sally Hattemer Treasurer
Elizabeth Flint Board President
Malina Maneevone Secretary
Esther Haas Board Member
Kathryn Russell Board Member
Gregg Yates Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Esther S Okamoto Artistic Director 9.7% of Rev
Jacquelyn Kimbro Executive Director 5.2% of Rev
Stephanie Morem Board President
Sally Hattemer Treasurer
Elizabeth Flint Board President
Malina Maneevone Secretary
Esther Haas Board Member
Kathryn Russell Board Member
Gregg Yates Board Member
Evelyn Coffey Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
23 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 34 other orgs in HI with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 20 points below the peer median (15 vs. 35).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 59.1% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.