Governance Lag
What does this mean?
Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.
The Path Forward
The Scaffold
Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.
Title
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2023 | — | — | — | 49 | Fragile | Recovery | |
| 2022 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2014 | — | — | — | 23 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2013 | — | — | — | 23 | Critical Intervention Needed | Recovery | |
| 2012 | — | — | — | 19 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch | |
| 2011 | — | — | — | 19 | Critical Intervention Needed | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2025
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BARRY BLOOM | Board President | — | ||
| ALUN HUW DAVIES | Board President | — | ||
| JAMES MEAD | Treasurer | — | ||
| DAVID ALBRIGHT | Board Member | — | ||
| LESLIE BIDER | Board Member | — | ||
| RICHARD D CHAPMAN | Board Member | — | ||
| DEVON MCCOURT | Board Member | — | ||
| JAMES LOGATTO | Board Member | — | ||
| HARRY MACKLOWE | Board Member | — | ||
| JOY BUNSON | Board Member | — | ||
| BRETT ROUSCH | Board Member | — | ||
| BARRY BLOOM | Board President | — | ||
| ALAN HUW DAVIES | Board President | — | ||
| JIM MEAD | Treasurer | — | ||
| DAVID ALBRIGHT | Board Member | — | ||
| LES BIDER | Board Member | — | ||
| RICK CHAPMAN | Board Member | — | ||
| EILEEN FOLEY | Board Member | — | ||
| JIM LOGATTO | Board Member | — | ||
| HARRY MACKLOWE | Board Member | — | ||
| MICHELE PARK | Board Member | — |
Score breakdown
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 34 other orgs in NY with NTEE prefix A1.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 15 points above the peer median (50 vs. 35).
5-year trend: Governance Lag
Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.