Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
33
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
10
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden 18.8% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 18.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 19.9% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — 19.1% 49 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 — — 9.4% 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 — — 7.3% 50 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 21.0% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 — — 7.3% 54 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 — — — 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LEANN STANDISH Executive Director 18.8% of Rev
ERMINA KARIM Board President —
BARBARA BELL Board President —
TRUDIE SAFRENO Treasurer —
CHERYL CUMING Secretary —
CHARLES CROTSER Board Member —
JOHN DUNN Board Member —
CHARLES FELTMAN Board Member —
LINDSEY HARN Board Member —
BEYA MAKEKAU Board Member —
DAVID RICHARDS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LEANN STANDISH Executive Director 19.7% of Rev
CHARLES FELTMAN Board President —
BARBARA BELL Board President —
CHUCK CROTSER Secretary —
TODD PETERSON Treasurer —
JOHN DUNN Board Member —
DEREK JOHNSON Board Member —
ERMINA KARIM Board Member —
JENNIFER PETTY Board Member —
DAVID RICHARDS Board Member —
TRUDIE SAFRENO Board Member —
LINDSEY STEPHENSON Board Member —
PHILIP J WILLIAMS Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARYELLEN SIMKINS Executive Director 5.7% of Rev
LEANN STANDISH Executive Director 3.5% of Rev
CHARLES FELTMAN Board President —
BARBARA BELL Board President —
ROBYN LETTERS Board President —
CARL BERNEY Secretary —
CHUCK CROTSER Secretary —
TODD PETERSON Treasurer —
TYLER BEATY Board Member —
ROGER CARMODY Board Member —
KC DUGGAN Board Member —
THERESA PERRY Board Member —
DAVID RICHARDS Board Member —
PHILIP WILLIAMS Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RUTA SALIKLIS Executive Director 8.3% of Rev
CARL BERNEY Secretary —
ROGER CARMODY Treasurer —
TYLER BEATY Board Member —
TOM BUTLER Board Member —
BRITTANY DARROW Board Member —
K C DUGGAN Board Member —
CHARLES FELTMAN Board Member —
LINDSEY HARN Board Member —
WYATT LEMONS Board Member —
THERESA PERRY Board Member —
NANCY PIVER Board Member —
ANDREW REICHERT Board Member —
BARB RENSHAW Board Member —
DAVID RICHARDS Board Member —
ROSEY ROSENTHAL Board Member —
LUCIE RYAN Board Member —
BEN TAYLOR Board Member —
MARYELLEN SIMKINS Executive Director —
DAVID COBURN Board President —
CHUCK CROTSER Board President —
ROBYN LETTERS Board President —
FLO BARTELL Secretary —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
10 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
33 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 68 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A4.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 63 points below the peer median (10 vs. 73).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.