Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 19.7% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2022 21.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 16.3% 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 9.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 9.6% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 4.2% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 13.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 4.8% 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 8.1% 44 Fragile Recovery
2014 4.1% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 10.0% 39 Fragile Gov Risk
2012 8.9% 44 Fragile Recovery
2011 6.5% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JOSE HERNANDEZ COO 12.1% of Rev
JACQUES HEIM Artistic Director 7.6% of Rev
KEVIN SUSMAN Board President
DOUG HUBERMAN Treasurer
EMILY MCCARY-PRICE Board Member
PRIYA SOPORI Board Member
SUSAN FRIEDMAN Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JACQUES HEIM Artistic Director 7.7% of Rev
JOSE HERNANDEZ Treasurer 7.0% of Rev
KEVIN SUSMAN Board President
DOUG HUBERMAN Board Member
EMILY MCCARY-PRICE Board Member
PRIYA SOPORI Board Member
SUSAN FRIEDMAN Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DUSTIN ALVARADO Treasurer 6.7% of Rev
JACQUES HEIM Artistic Director 4.8% of Rev
KEVIN SUSMAN Board President
DOUG HUBERMAN Board Member
EMILY MCCARY-PRICE Board Member
PRIYA SOPORI Board Member
SUSAN FRIEDMAN Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JACQUES HEIM Artistic Director 6.0% of Rev
DUSTIN ALVARADO GENERAL MANAGER 5.6% of Rev
KEVIN SUSMAN Board President
DOUG HUBERMAN Board Member
EMILY MCCARY-PRICE Board Member
PRIYA SOPORI Board Member
CHIP LARGMAN Board Member
SUSAN FRIEDMAN Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.