Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
42
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 24.2% 42 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 25.2% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2021 15.1% 48 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 18.3% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 17.8% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 24.9% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2017 12.3% 43 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 16.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 44 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2013 8.2% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 5.1% 50 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL JOHN GARCES Artistic Director 9.1% of Rev
MEGAN WANLASS Board Member 8.9% of Rev
MARK VALDEZ Board President 0.5% of Rev
CLEMENTINE BORDEAUX Secretary 0.5% of Rev
APRIL IBARRA Board Member
LEANNA HALLMAN Board Member
ELIZABETH KENNEDY Board Member
SARAH LANG Treasurer
GENEVIEVE RIUTORT Board President
TENA YATROUSSIS Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL JOHN GARCES Artistic Director 9.1% of Rev
MEGAN WANLASS Board Member 9.1% of Rev
MARK VALDEZ Board President 1.0% of Rev
APRIL IBARRA Board President
CLEMENTINE BORDEAUX Secretary
LEANNA HALLMAN Board Member
ELIZABETH KENNEDY Board Member
SARAH LANG Board Member
GENEVIEVE RIUTORT Board Member
TENA YATROUSSIS Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL JOHN GARCS Artistic Director 9.1% of Rev
MEGAN WANLASS Board Member 9.1% of Rev
PAULA ELY Board President
APRIL IBARRA Board President
CLEMENTINE BORDEAUX Secretary
MARK VALDEZ Treasurer
ELLEN GAVIN Board Member
LEANNA HALLMAN Board Member
ELIZABETH KENNEDY Board Member
SARAH LANG Board Member
GENEVIEVE RIUTORT Board Member
TENA YATROUSSIS Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
42 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 30 → 42 over 5 years (improving by 12 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 24.2% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.