Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
37
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 20.4% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 — — 14.6% 39 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 27.7% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 51.1% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 — — 27.5% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 21.6% 47 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 39.8% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 42.3% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 45.3% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 — — 57.0% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 — — 51.6% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 — — 45.5% 42 Fragile Gov Risk
2011 — — 28.4% 38 Fragile Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ruth Price Artistic Director 16.1% of Rev
Andy Galker Secretary —
Julie Bergman Board Member —
Ray Diwan Board Member —
Joseph Herron Board Member —
Frederick Ho Board Member —
Karen Kennedy Board Member —
Paul Pegas Board Member —
Glen Ward Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ruth Price Artistic Director 16.1% of Rev
Andy Galker Secretary —
Frederick Ho Board Member —
Glen Ward Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ruth Price Artistic Director 16.1% of Rev
Joseph Walker Chairman —
Richard Posell Vice Chairman —
Andy Galker Secretary —
Alan Bergman Board Member —
Allan Burns Board Member —
Anita DeFrantz Board Member —
Frederick Ho Board Member —
Sherrill Luke Board Member —
Darin Morris Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Ruth Price Artistic Director 43.0% of Rev
Ruth Price Artistic Director 43.0% of Rev
Ruth Price Artistic Director 38.5% of Rev
Jeff Gauthier Executive Director 21.1% of Rev
Jeff Gauthier Executive Director 4.6% of Rev
Joseph Walker Chairman —
Richard Posell Vice Chairman —
Stan Morris Treasurer —
Andy Galker Secretary —
Alan Bergman Board Member —
Allan Burns Board Member —
John Comerford Board Member —
Anita DeFrantz Board Member —
Frederick Ho Board Member —
Sherrill Luke Board Member —
Darin Morris Board Member —
Joseph Walker Chairman —
Joseph Sullivan Board Member —
Richard Posell Vice Chairman —
Barbara Goen Board Member —
Andy Galker Secretary —
Alan Bergman Board Member —
Allan Burns Board Member —
Anita DeFrantz Board Member —
Frederick Ho Board Member —
Sherrill Luke Board Member —
Darin Morris Board Member —
Jeff Gauthier Executive Director —
Joseph Walker Chairman —
Richard Posell Vice Chairman —
Andy Galker Secretary —
Alan Bergman Board Member —
Allan Burns Board Member —
Anita DeFrantz Board Member —
Frederick Ho Board Member —
Sherrill Luke Board Member —
Darin Morris Board Member —
Joseph Sullivan Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
37 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points below the peer median (25 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.