Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
49
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 49 Fragile Recovery
2022 39 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 39 Fragile Recovery
2020 38 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 48 Fragile Recovery
2018 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 49 Fragile Recovery
2015 24.7% 43 Fragile Gov Risk
2014 49 Fragile Recovery
2013 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 41 Fragile Recovery
2011 37 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
John Porter EdD Board President
Timothy Doerfler Treasurer
Jennifer Duke Board Member
Ric Garrison Secretary
Tim Fuller Board Member
Gretchen Anton Board Member
Tom Backemeyer Board Member
R Steven Derryberry Board President
Rebecca Smith Board Member
Mark V Bozigian Board Member
Shawn Cabey Board Member
Bill Silva Board Member
Harvey Holloway Board Member
Timothy Doerfler Treasurer
Jennifer Duke Board Member
Ric Garrison Secretary
Tim Fuller Board President
Gretchen Anton Board Member
R Steven Derryberry Board President
Rebecca Smith Board Member
Mark V Bozigian Board Member
Shawn Cabey Board Member
Bill Silva Board Member
Harvey Holloway Board Member
Nikki Olofson Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
49 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 27 points above the peer median (60 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 48 → 49 over 5 years (improving by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.