Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle
Overall
47
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 17.5% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 64 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 7.4% 50 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 1.6% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 3.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 12.4% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 11.2% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 12.5% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 9.0% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Bethers Annette Executive Dir. 13.7% of Rev
Ruan Kylie Departed 1223 Executive Dir. 12.8% of Rev
Bethers Annette Eff 324 Executive Dir. 4.7% of Rev
Thompson Debbie Treasurer 0.2% of Rev
Bosco Austina Board Member
Geils Laurelle Board Member
Gates Joanna Departed 224 Board President
Thompson Debbie Treasurer
Stein Leanne Secretary
Valadez Frank Board President
Amador Begona Board Member
Aguirre Joe Eff 224 Board Member
Michael Stein Eff 324 Board Member
Bosco Austina Board Member
Geils Laurelle eff 1124 Board Member
Rivera Gilbert Eff 125 Board Member
Stein Leanne Secretary
Valadez Frank Board President
Amador Begonia Board Member
Aguirre Joe Board Member
Stein Michael Board Member
Gardner Cathy Eff 0724 Board Member
Zagon Sophia Eff 125 Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Bosco Austina Board Member
Geils Laurelle Board Member
Ruan Kylie Executive Dir.
Gates Joanna Board President
Thompson Debbie Treasurer
Stein Leanne Secretary
Valadez Frank Board President
Amador Begona Board Member
Peshek Brian-Departed 922 Board Member
Amador Begonia Board Member
Bike Benita Board Member
Bosco Austina Vice President
Gates Joanna Board Member
Guiles Laurelle Executive Dir.
McKinney Ruth Board Member
Peshek Brian Board Member
Thompson Debbie Treasurer
Stein Leanne Board Member
Valdez Frank Board President
Young Carolyn Board Member
Zapp Jennifer Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Bosco Austin Vice President
Guiles Lorelle Executive Dir.
Moore Carin Board Member
Pesek Brian Board Member
Thompson Debbie Treasurer
Stein Leanne Board Member
Valdez Frank Board President
Bosco Austin Vice President
Guiles Lorelle Executive Dir.
Moore Carin Board Member
Pesek Brian Board Member
Thompson Debbie Treasurer
Stein Leanne Board Member
Valdez Frank Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 171 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 16 points above the peer median (50 vs. 34).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.