Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
32
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 54.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 41.2% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 14.9% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 -9.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 13.2% 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 12.2% 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 42 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 54.0% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2013 43.6% 48 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2012 9.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 9.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DALIA GARCIA Executive Director 54.8% of Rev
ARTURO HEREDIA SOTO Board Member
DEBRA HERRICK Board Member
VANESSA WALLACE-GONZALES Board Member
ADRIANA ARRIAGA Board Member
FREDERICK JANKA Board President
CAROLYN MERINO MULLLIN Board President
SILVIA PEREA Board President
LAURA HYATT Secretary
XAVIERA SIMMONS Treasurer
INGRID BOSTROM Board Member
PORFIRIO GUTIRREZ Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Laura Macker Johnston Executive Director 51.2% of Rev
Alexandra Cole Secretary
Crosby Slaught Treasurer
Jacquelyn Klein-Brown Board Member
Davin Mantell Board Member
Marni Margerum Board Member
Lisa Lloyd Board Member
Debby Peterson Board Member
Maria Rendon Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LISA LLOYD Board Member
DEBBY PETERSON Board Member
MARIA RENDON Board Member
MARNI MARGERUM Board Member
JACQUELYN KLEIN-BROWN Board Member
DAVIN MANTELL Board Member
LAURA MACKER JOHNSTON Board President
ALEXANDRA COLE Secretary
CROSBY SLAUGHT Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 171 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 15 points below the peer median (15 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 54.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.