Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
32
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 54.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 41.2% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 — — 14.9% 45 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 — — -9.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — — 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — 13.2% 44 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 — — 12.2% 43 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — — 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 42 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2014 — — 54.0% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2013 — — 43.6% 48 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2012 — — 9.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — 9.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DALIA GARCIA Executive Director 54.8% of Rev
ARTURO HEREDIA SOTO Board Member —
DEBRA HERRICK Board Member —
VANESSA WALLACE-GONZALES Board Member —
ADRIANA ARRIAGA Board Member —
FREDERICK JANKA Board President —
CAROLYN MERINO MULLLIN Board President —
SILVIA PEREA Board President —
LAURA HYATT Secretary —
XAVIERA SIMMONS Treasurer —
INGRID BOSTROM Board Member —
PORFIRIO GUTIRREZ Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Laura Macker Johnston Executive Director 51.2% of Rev
Alexandra Cole Secretary —
Crosby Slaught Treasurer —
Jacquelyn Klein-Brown Board Member —
Davin Mantell Board Member —
Marni Margerum Board Member —
Lisa Lloyd Board Member —
Debby Peterson Board Member —
Maria Rendon Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LISA LLOYD Board Member —
DEBBY PETERSON Board Member —
MARIA RENDON Board Member —
MARNI MARGERUM Board Member —
JACQUELYN KLEIN-BROWN Board Member —
DAVIN MANTELL Board Member —
LAURA MACKER JOHNSTON Board President —
ALEXANDRA COLE Secretary —
CROSBY SLAUGHT Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
32 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,023 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 37 points below the peer median (42 vs. 79).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 54.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.