Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence
Overall
40
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 35.8% 40 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 7.4% 54 Fragile Recovery
2021 10.9% 51 Fragile Recovery
2020 15.2% 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 16.5% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 10.4% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 4.1% 55 Fragile Recovery
2016 17.9% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 5.1% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 6.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2013 7.2% 50 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 8.4% 50 Fragile Recovery
2011 9.1% 46 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBORAH KLOCHKO Executive Dir. 11.9% of Rev
VIVIENNE ESRIG Board Member 7.7% of Rev
JOHN MULLEN Board President
JON DOELLSTEDT Board Member
KEN HERTZ Board Member
RICHARD OPPER Board Member
CHERYL HAMER Board Member
STEPHANIE BERGSMA Board Member
KATHLEEN STOUGHTON Board Member
LISA MILLER Secretary
KEN CARIFFE Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBORAH KLOCHKO Executive Dir. 11.4% of Rev
VIVIENNE ESRIG Board Member 6.8% of Rev
JOHN MULLEN Board President
JOHN DOELLSTEDT Board Member
SUDA HOUSE Board Member
CLAUDIA SALAZAR Board Member
RICHARD OPPER Board Member
CHRISTOPHER KOZO Board Member
LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN Board Member
STEPHANIE BERGSMA Board President
LISA BROCKMAN Treasurer
MARY-ROSE MUELLER Board Member
KATHLEEN STOUGHTON Board Member
PATRICIA JUDD Board Member
LISA MILLER Secretary
MERRY CRISTIANI Board Member
KEN CARIFFE Board Member
REGINALD JONES Board Member
YITAH LEE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBORAH KLOCHKO Executive Dir. 11.6% of Rev
VIVIENNE ESRIG Board Member 7.7% of Rev
JOHN MULLEN Board President
JON DOELLSTEDT Board Member
SUDA HOUSE Board Member
CHRIS KOZO Board Member
RICHARD OPPER Board President
DOUG SAIN Board Member
JEFFREY RESSLER Board Member
RON FRIEDMAN Board Member
STEPHANIE BERGSMA Secretary
LISA BROCKMAN Treasurer
LAURA GALINSON Board Member
MARY-ROSE MUELLER Board Member
KATHLEEN STOUGHTON Board Member
PAT JUDD Board Member
LISA MILLER Board Member
MERRY CRISTIANI Board Member
KEN A CARIFFE Board Member
REGINALD JONES Board Member
YITAH LEE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 29 points above the peer median (60 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 41 → 40 over 5 years (declining by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 35.8% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~28 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.