Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
47
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 16.6% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 10.7% 52 Fragile Stable Watch
2021 — — 12.4% 52 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 15.5% 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 12.5% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — 6.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 18.4% 47 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 29.1% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2015 — — 6.7% 54 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — 12.0% 42 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 — — 27.0% 37 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 — — 24.1% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2011 — — 10.6% 48 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RONALD NELSON Executive Dir. 10.8% of Rev
IRIS QUIROZ DIR OF INSTITUTIONAL ADVANCEMENT 5.9% of Rev
LAURA MILLMAN Board Member —
DEBBIE AUTREY Board Member —
MARK GUILLEN Board Member —
DR OLIVER BROOKS Board Member —
DONITA VAN HORIK Board Member —
MARYBETH KANE Board Member —
BARBARA WILDE Board Member —
WAYNE BRANDER Board President —
SYLVIA HARTMAN Board Member —
ANIA SULLIVAN Board Member —
DONITA JOSEPH Treasurer —
MARSHA JEFFER Secretary —
PAMELA MUNZER Board Member —
DON GIBBS Board Member —
MATTHEW RABIN Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RON NELSON Executive Dir. 10.3% of Rev
MATHEW RABIN Board President —
MARSHA JEFFER Secretary —
DONITA JOSEPH Treasurer —
DEBBIE AUTREY Board Member —
TALA BALTAZAR Board Member —
WAYNE BRANDER Board Member —
OLIVER BROOKS Board Member —
DON GIBBS Board Member —
MARK GUILLEN Board Member —
SYLVIA HARTMAN Board Member —
ROBERTA JENKINS Board Member —
LAURA MILLMAN Board Member —
PAM MUNZER Board Member —
ANIA SULLIVAN Board Member —
DONITA VAN HORIK Board Member —
BARBARA WILDE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RON NELSON Executive Dir. 10.0% of Rev
MATHEW RABIN Board President —
MARSHA JEFFER Secretary —
DONITA JOSEPH Treasurer —
DEBBIE AUTREY Board Member —
TALA BALTAZAR Board Member —
WAYNE BRANDER Board Member —
OLIVER BROOKS Board Member —
DON GIBBS Board Member —
MARK GUILLEN Board Member —
SYLVIA HARTMAN Board Member —
ROBERTA JENKINS Board Member —
LAURA MILLMAN Board Member —
PAM MUNZER Board Member —
ANIA SULLIVAN Board Member —
DONITA VAN HORIK Board Member —
BARBARA WILDE Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RON NELSON Executive Dir. 10.0% of Rev
MATHEW RABIN Board President —
MARSHA JEFFER Secretary —
DONITA JOSEPH Treasurer —
DEBBIE AUTREY Board Member —
TALA BALTAZAR Board Member —
WAYNE BRANDER Board Member —
OLIVER BROOKS Board Member —
DON GIBBS Board Member —
MARK GUILLEN Board Member —
SYLVIA HARTMAN Board Member —
ROBERTA JENKINS Board Member —
LAURA MILLMAN Board Member —
PAM MUNZER Board Member —
ANIA SULLIVAN Board Member —
DONITA VAN HORIK Board Member —
BARBARA WILDE Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
47 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 333 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 36 points below the peer median (45 vs. 81).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.