Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
16
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
0
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 16 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 9.2% 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 36.8% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 26.9% 52 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 22.5% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2018 9.7% 58 Fragile Recovery
2017 7.7% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 10.0% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 9.9% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 8.5% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 8.2% 54 Fragile Recovery
2012 10.3% 46 Fragile Recovery
2011 15.7% 35 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHANIE WEAVER Executive Dir. 4.6% of Rev
STEVEN SCHICK Board Member 3.3% of Rev
RUBEN VALENZUELA Board Member 0.6% of Rev
BRIAN SCHOTTLAENDER Board President
EINAR GALL Board President
BETTY MCMANUS Board President
RAND STEIGER Board Member
JEANNE FERRANTE Board Member
ERICA GAMBLE Secretary
OLIVIA GRAEVE Board Member
JAMES LAUTH Board Member
PETER TAYLOR Board Member
CATHY FUNKE Board Member
BRIAN SCHOTTLAENDER Board President
EINAR GALL Board President
BETTY MCMANUS Board President
RAND STEIGER Board Member
JEANNE FERRANTE Board Member
ERICA GAMBLE Secretary
OLIVIA GRAEVE Board Member
JAMES LAUTH Board Member
STEPHANIE WEAVER Executive Dir.
STEVEN SCHICK Board Member
RUBEN VALENZUELA Board Member
PETER TAYLOR Board Member
CATHY FUNKE Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEPHANIE WEAVER Executive Dir. 4.4% of Rev
STEVEN SCHICK Board Member 3.1% of Rev
RUBEN VALENZUELA Board Member 1.2% of Rev
PAT FINN Board President
BRIAN SCHOTTLAENDER Board President
EINAR GALL Treasurer
BETTY MCMANUS Board President
RAND STEIGER Board Member
JEANNE FERRANTE Board Member
ERICA GAMBLE Secretary
CAROL LAM Board Member
JAMES LAUTH Board Member
PETER TAYLOR Board Member
CATHY FUNKE Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DIANE SALISBURY term 83019 Executive Dir. 3.0% of Rev
STEVEN SCHICK Board Member 2.7% of Rev
STEPHANIE WEAVER Beg 92319 Executive Dir. 1.2% of Rev
RUBEN VALENZUELA Board Member 0.5% of Rev
PAT FINN Board President
BRIAN SCHOTTLAENDER Board President
EINAR GALL Board Member
BETTY MCMANUS Board President
PETER GOUREVITCH Board Member
JEANNE FERRANTE Board Member
ERICA GAMBLE Secretary
CATHERINE PALMER Treasurer
PAUL SYMCZAK Board Member
CAROL LAM Board Member
JAMES LAUTH Board Member
PETER TAYLOR Board Member
MARK APPELBAUM Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
16 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (0 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 47 → 16 over 5 years (declining by 31 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.