Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Stabilization

What does this mean?

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

The Path Forward

The Dawn

Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.

The Dawn
The Dawn
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Stabilization
Overall
40
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
60
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Acute Stabilization

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2022 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2021 40 Fragile Gov Risk
2020 9.7% 40 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 116.0% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2018 16.6% 36 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2017 8.8% 42 Fragile Gov Risk
2016 12.4% 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 6.2% 44 Fragile Recovery
2014 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TIMOTHY OLSON Board Member 4.7% of Rev
MONIQUE N GRAJEDA Secretary 3.4% of Rev
ROBERT S RANKIN Treasurer 3.4% of Rev
MADELYN K ROPNER NOBLE GRAND
PER MATHIESEN VICE GRAND
BRENT LAMON Board Member
BRUCE FRASER Board Member
RICHARD BROWN Board Member
KIRK GRAVES Board Member
STEVE SLAUGHTER Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
TIMOTHY OLSON BUILDING MGR 4.6% of Rev
STEVEN SOENKE FINANCIAL SE 1.7% of Rev
MORGAN PHILBIN Treasurer 0.7% of Rev
RICHARD BROWN Board Member
KIRK GRAVES Board Member
HARDIE PHILIP Board Member
STEPHEN SLAUGHTER Board Member
JEANETTE ANDREWS VICE GRAND
TIM BECHER NOBLE GRAND
PAUL KANEY WARDEN
DENIS PHILBIN Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
60 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
40 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 27 points above the peer median (60 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Acute Stabilization

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.