Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
44
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 36.9% 44 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2023 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 40.0% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 51 Fragile Recovery
2019 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2017 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 47 Fragile Recovery
2015 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 37 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christian Baldini Board Member 36.9% of Rev
Barbara Tracy Board President
Lynette Hart Secretary
James Tracy Treasurer
Roseanna Torretto Board Member
Julie Montgomery Orchestra Representive
Benjamin Hart Board Member
Jonathan Thurston Board Member
Linda Meyers Board Member
Steven Kaiser Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christian Baldini Board Member 33.2% of Rev
Barbara Tracy Board President
Lynette Hart Secretary
James Tracy Treasurer
Roseanna Torretto Board Member
Julie Montgomery Orchestra Representive
Benjamin Hart Board Member
Jonathan Thurston Board Member
Linda Meyers Board Member
Steven Kaiser Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 22 points above the peer median (55 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 36.9% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~30 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.