Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
38
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 38 Fragile Recovery
2023 Hidden Hidden 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 44 Fragile Recovery
2020 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 39 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 47 Fragile Recovery
2012 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2010 45 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
HELENE WICKETT Board Member
SARAH SMITH Board Member
PAULA KAROLAK Board President
MERLE RABINE Board President
ROBERT BEARD Treasurer
PETER HWANG Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAULA KAROLAK Board President
MERLE RABINE Board President
ROBERT BEARD Treasurer
PETER HWANG Secretary
STEPHEN PAULSON Board Member
FRANKLIN DAVIS Board Member
HELENE WICKETT Board Member
SARAH SMITH Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAULA KAROLAK Board President
MERLE RABINE Board President
ROBERT BEARD Treasurer
PETER HWANG Secretary
STEPHEN PAULSON Board Member
FRANKLIN DAVIS Board Member
HELENE WICKETT Board Member
SARAH SMITH Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 17 points below the peer median (15 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.