Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
36
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — 54.6% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2023 — — 34.7% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 — — 49.6% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 — — 46.3% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 — — 49.4% 48 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 — — — 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — — 51 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — — 37 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 37 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 — — — 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Owen Dalby Executive Director 27.3% of Rev
Meena Bhasin Executive Director 27.3% of Rev
Charlotte Burchard Board President —
Ray Walton Board President —
Emi Uyehara Secretary —
Neil Sekhri Treasurer —
Ilya Levtov Board Member —
Carol Harris Board Member —
Gayle Tsern Strang Board Member —
Jackie Holen Board Member —
Todd Hosfelt Board Member —
Andrea Higgins Board Member —
Steve Suda Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Owen Dalby Artistic Director 18.4% of Rev
Meena Bhasin Artistic Director 18.4% of Rev
Owen Dalby Artistic Director 16.0% of Rev
Meena Bhasin Artistic Director 15.7% of Rev
Ray Walton Board President —
Charlotte Burchard Board President —
Ilya Levtov Board Member —
Neil Sekhri Treasurer —
Emi Uyehara Secretary —
Carol Harris Board Member —
Ray Walton Board President —
Charlotte Burchard Board President —
Ilya Levtov Board Member —
Neil Sekhri Treasurer —
Emi Uyehara Secretary —
Carol Harris Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Owen Dalby Artistic Director 13.6% of Rev
Meena Bhasin Artistic Director 13.4% of Rev
Ray Walton Board President —
Charles McCullough Board Member —
Charlotte Burchard Board Member —
Ilya Levtov Board Member —
Neil Sekhri Board Member —
Lisa Baird Board Member —
Faye Chao Sofaer Board Member —
Carol Harris Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points below the peer median (25 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 54.6% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~40 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.