Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
44
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 6.2% 44 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — 15.2% 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 10.9% 48 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 9.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 8.6% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — 7.7% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 — — 7.2% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2016 — — 7.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 8.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 8.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — 9.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — 9.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — 9.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JENNIFER TUCKER Board Member 4.6% of Rev
CAROLYN AGAN Artistic Director 1.6% of Rev
RYAN LILE Board President —
ALEXA SKILLING Board President —
DIANNA CALEY Treasurer —
MONICA LUEDKE Secretary —
STELLA BATZEL Board Member —
MEG OWEN Board Member —
JANET SCHWEIZER Board Member —
CHINDA TILSON Board Member —
SIERRA ZANGHI Board Member —
FRANK BRUNO Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LANI BROCKMAN Artistic Director 5.8% of Rev
JENNIFER TUCKER Board Member 4.6% of Rev
DANA FIALDINI Board Member 1.6% of Rev
BECKY HENCHMAN Board President 0.6% of Rev
NATALIE BARNEY Board President —
MARY BETH BINNS Secretary —
DEBBIE LEVITON Treasurer —
ANNETTE BOVEY Board Member —
MATTHEW COLPITTS Board Member —
COREY DUNNE Board Member —
BETH GALE Board Member —
RYAN LILE Board Member —
MONICA LUEDKE Board Member —
MELANIE RYAN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Lani Brockman Artistic Director 3.8% of Rev
Angela Gist Executive Director 3.7% of Rev
Shiraz Cupala Board President —
Becky Henchman Board President —
Natalie Barney Secretary —
Julie Trott Treasurer —
Mary Beth Binns Board Member —
Annette Bovey Board Member —
Corey Dunne Board Member —
Dana Fialdini Board Member —
Beth Gale Board Member —
Debbie Leviton Board Member —
Alice Ormsby Board Member —
Timothy Vokes Board Member —
Jennifer Tucker Executive Director —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Angela Gist Board Member 4.0% of Rev
Lani Brockman Artistic Director 3.9% of Rev
Nikki Parish Board Member 1.7% of Rev
Shiraz Cupala Board President —
Becky Henchman Board President —
Natalie Barney Secretary —
Julie Trott Treasurer —
Alice Ormsby MD Board Member —
Beth Gale Board Member —
Timothy Vokes Board Member —
Annette Bovey Board Member —
Mary Beth Binns Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
44 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 332 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.