Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 23.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 28.9% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 26.5% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 64.0% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 36.7% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 — — 23.0% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — 21.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 32.0% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 20.2% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 — — 29.2% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 32.1% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 — — 35.5% 19 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — 33.7% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2010 — — 28.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Maren Amdal Executive Director 12.0% of Rev
Terrance Kelly Artistic Director 10.4% of Rev
Will Wright Board President —
Kathy Davis Treasurer —
Jim Fisher Secretary —
Lauren Becker Board Member —
Joshua Gamson Board Member —
Lila Bailey Board Member —
Isaac Hanson Board Member —
Christina Zou Board Member —
Sharon Hymes-Offord Board Member —
Monica LaBoskey Board Member —
Dr Mark Wilson Board Member —
Patrick Zimski Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Maren Amdal Executive Director 12.9% of Rev
Terrance Kelly Artistic Director 10.9% of Rev
Jorge Choy Board Member —
Nicolia Gooding Board President —
Pauline Marx Board Member —
Matthew Adjiake Board Member —
Lauren Becker Board Member —
Kathy Davis Treasurer —
Jim Fisher Secretary —
Carolyn Gauthier Board Member —
Michele Hanson Board Member —
Sharon Hymes-Offord Board Member —
Monica LaBoskey Board Member —
Perika Sampson Board Member —
Will Wright Board President —
Patrick Zimski Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Terrance Kelly Artistic Director 10.4% of Rev
Executive Director 9.0% of Rev
David Page Board Member —
Nancy Smith Board Member —
Mark McClure Board Member —
Jorge Choy Board Member —
Susan Burns Board Member —
Michael Gooding Board President —
Nicolia Gooding Board President —
Arthur Barker Secretary —
Pauline Marx Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points below the peer median (0 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.