Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
40
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 48 Fragile Recovery
2021 45 Fragile Recovery
2020 46 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 46 Fragile Recovery
2018 39 Fragile Recovery
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 19.3% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 21.8% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 20.9% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 19.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 19.5% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NOELLE LANE Secretary
KAILIN LEMEI Board Member
DANIEL MARTIN Board President
ERICA RACZ Board Member
JENNIFER TOSETTI Treasurer

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NOELLE LANE Secretary
DANNY MARTIN Board President
SUSAN SAVICH Treasurer

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
NOELLE LANE Secretary
DANNY MARTIN Board President
SUSAN SAVICH Treasurer

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CHARLIE KISSICK Treasurer
DANNY MARTIN Board President
CAROLINE NAITO Board President
SARAH SIMNETT Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
40 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 14 points above the peer median (45 vs. 31).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.