Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
29
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 17.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 13.3% 39 Fragile Recovery
2021 18.0% 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 36.0% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 14.5% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 16.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 18.4% 39 Fragile Recovery
2016 11.1% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 10.9% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 17.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 12.0% 42 Fragile Recovery
2012 16.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 14.4% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Cory Combs Executive Dir. 7.3% of Rev
Jim Nadel Board President 2.2% of Rev
Taylor Eigsti Board Member 0.1% of Rev
Bob Murphy Secretary 0.1% of Rev
TomokoFunaki Board Member 0.0% of Rev
Karen Nagy Board President
John Monroe Treasurer
Fred Spitz Board President
Ralph Deadwyler Board Member
Anthony Diamond Board Member
Robert Yoerg Board Member
Ronda Rosner Board Member
Stephen M Sano Board Member
Joan Talbert Board Member
Sharon Yoerg Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jim Nadel Board President 8.2% of Rev
David C Miller Executive Dir. 6.1% of Rev
Taylor Eigsti Board Member 0.2% of Rev
Bob Murphy Secretary 0.1% of Rev
Karen Nagy Board President
Ronda Rosner Treasurer
Lois Anderson Board Member
Ralph Deadwyler Board Member
Anthony Diamond Board Member
John Monroe Board Member
Sheila M Riley Board Member
Stephen M Sano Board Member
Joan Talbert Board Member
Sharon Yoerg Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jim Nadel Board President 8.4% of Rev
David C Miller Executive Dir. 6.7% of Rev
Taylor Eigsti Board Member 0.0% of Rev
Karen Nagy Board President
Ronda Rosner Treasurer
Bob Murphy Secretary
Lois Anderson Board Member
Ralph Deadwyler Board Member
Anthony Diamond Board Member
John Monroe Board Member
Sheila M Riley Board Member
Stephen M Sano Board Member
Joan Talbert Board Member
Sharon Yoerg Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jim Nadel Board President 6.9% of Rev
David C Miller Executive Dir. 5.0% of Rev
Karen Nagy Board President
Sheila M Riley Board President
Ronda Rosner Treasurer
Kay Kleinerman Secretary
Anthony Diamond Board Member
Taylor Eigsti Board Member
Al Eisenstat Board Member
Larry Mohr Board Member
Bob Murphy Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 829 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 33 points below the peer median (0 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.