Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
29
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 17.6% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 13.3% 39 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 18.0% 43 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 36.0% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 — — 14.5% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — 16.9% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 — — 18.4% 39 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 11.1% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 — — 10.9% 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — 17.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 — — 12.0% 42 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — 16.1% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — 14.4% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Cory Combs Executive Dir. 7.3% of Rev
Jim Nadel Board President 2.2% of Rev
Taylor Eigsti Board Member 0.1% of Rev
Bob Murphy Secretary 0.1% of Rev
TomokoFunaki Board Member 0.0% of Rev
Karen Nagy Board President —
John Monroe Treasurer —
Fred Spitz Board President —
Ralph Deadwyler Board Member —
Anthony Diamond Board Member —
Robert Yoerg Board Member —
Ronda Rosner Board Member —
Stephen M Sano Board Member —
Joan Talbert Board Member —
Sharon Yoerg Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jim Nadel Board President 8.2% of Rev
David C Miller Executive Dir. 6.1% of Rev
Taylor Eigsti Board Member 0.2% of Rev
Bob Murphy Secretary 0.1% of Rev
Karen Nagy Board President —
Ronda Rosner Treasurer —
Lois Anderson Board Member —
Ralph Deadwyler Board Member —
Anthony Diamond Board Member —
John Monroe Board Member —
Sheila M Riley Board Member —
Stephen M Sano Board Member —
Joan Talbert Board Member —
Sharon Yoerg Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jim Nadel Board President 8.4% of Rev
David C Miller Executive Dir. 6.7% of Rev
Taylor Eigsti Board Member 0.0% of Rev
Karen Nagy Board President —
Ronda Rosner Treasurer —
Bob Murphy Secretary —
Lois Anderson Board Member —
Ralph Deadwyler Board Member —
Anthony Diamond Board Member —
John Monroe Board Member —
Sheila M Riley Board Member —
Stephen M Sano Board Member —
Joan Talbert Board Member —
Sharon Yoerg Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jim Nadel Board President 6.9% of Rev
David C Miller Executive Dir. 5.0% of Rev
Karen Nagy Board President —
Sheila M Riley Board President —
Ronda Rosner Treasurer —
Kay Kleinerman Secretary —
Anthony Diamond Board Member —
Taylor Eigsti Board Member —
Al Eisenstat Board Member —
Larry Mohr Board Member —
Bob Murphy Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,424 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points below the peer median (0 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.