Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
48
Score
Governance
55
Score
Financial
35
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 7.6% 48 Fragile Recovery
2022 8.1% 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 7.0% 54 Fragile Stable Watch
2020 8.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2019 6.6% 42 Fragile Recovery
2018 7.3% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 9.4% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2016 9.3% 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2015 8.9% 50 Fragile Recovery
2014 11.4% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 10.8% 48 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 12.2% 45 Fragile Recovery
2011 20.4% 43 Fragile Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
John Gilbreath Executive Dir. 7.6% of Rev
Ruby Smith Love Board Member
Jazmyn Scott Board President
Chris Icasiano Board President
Augusto Cardoso Secretary
Maurice James Board Member
Marcos Zuniga Board Member
Kellly Clingan Board Member
Arlene Fairfield Board Member
Alex Dugdale Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
John Gilbreath Executive Dir. 6.9% of Rev
Ruby Smith Love Board Member
John W Comeford Board President
Chris Icasiano Board President
Danielle Leigh Board President
Diane Wah Board Member
Augusto Cardoso Board Member
Sheila Hughes Treasurer
Maurice James Board Member
Chris Nutter Secretary
Gail Pettis Board Member
Kenneth W Masters Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
35 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
55 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 235 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 42 → 48 over 5 years (improving by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.