Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
34
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 35.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 27.7% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 38.2% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 39.6% 40 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 34.7% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2018 31.7% 38 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2017 31.7% 38 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2016 31.5% 36 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2015 29.8% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 27.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 43.5% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 23.8% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LARRY CESSPOOCH Board Member
KATHLEEN CHRISTY Board Member
EFREN CORADO GARCIA Board Member
AMOS N GUIORA Board Member
DAVID LITVACK Board Member
RUSSELL Y MINAS Board President
BRIAN F PATRICK Board Member
DAVID BADDLEY PHD Board Member
NATALYA RAPOPORT Board Member
LESLIE KELEN EXECUTIVE DI

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LESLIE KELEN EXECUTIVE DI 35.7% of Rev
LARRY CESSPOOCH Board Member
KATHLEEN CHRISTY Board Member
AMOS N GUIORA Board Member
DAVID LITVACK Board Member
RUSSELL Y MINAS Board President
BRIAN F PATRICK Board Member
DAVID BADDLEY PHD Board Member
NATALYA RAPOPORT Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LESLIE KELEN EXECUTIVE DI 35.7% of Rev
LESLIE KELEN EXECUTIVE DI 35.7% of Rev
LARRY CESSPOOCH Board Member
KATHLEEN CHRISTY Board Member
AMOS N GUIORA Board Member
RUSSELL Y MINAS Board President
BRITTNEY R NYSTROM Board Member
BRIAN F PATRICK Board Member
DAVID BADDLEY PHD Board Member
NATALYA RAPOPORT Board Member
LARRY CESSPOOCH Board Member
KATHLEEN CHRISTY Board Member
AMOS N GUIORA Board Member
RUSSELL Y MINAS Board President
BRITTNEY R NYSTROM Board Member
BRIAN F PATRICK Board Member
DAVID BADDLEY PHD Board Member
NATALYA RAPOPORT Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Fewer than 3 peers found in UT for this NTEE subcategory; peer comparison would not be statistically meaningful.

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 42 → 34 over 5 years (declining by 8 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 35.7% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~27 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.