Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
39
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 39 Fragile Recovery
2022 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2019 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2018 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2013 50 Fragile Recovery
2012 38 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 45 Fragile Decline Risk
2010 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBRA COLLETTI Board President
GABE HANZELI Board President
WILLIAM VILLASENOR Treasurer
BRIAN CHASE Secretary
CECILIA AGUERRE Board Member
ELSA BEHNEY Board Member
JOHN BRONDELLO Board Member
CLAUDIA CASTA-PECORA Board Member
MICHAEL SCOTT FEELEY Board Member
GILBERT GEMBACZ Board Member
MARIA GRANT Board Member
GEORGY HAWLEY Board Member
MARICIA HOBBS Board Member
KATHLEEN HUSTON Board Member
JOHN MCDONNELL JR Board Member
MICHAEL MOLINA Board Member
ANDRIA PINKOWSKI Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DEBRA COLLETTI Board President
GABE HANZELI Board President
KAPIL MAHENDRA Treasurer
BRIAN CHASE Secretary
CECILIA AGUERRE Board Member
ELSA BEHNEY Board Member
MICHAEL SCOTT FEELEY Board Member
MARIA GRANT Board Member
GEORGE HAWLEY Board Member
KATHLEEN HUSTON Board Member
JOHN L MCDONNELL JR Board Member
MARCIA HOBBS Board Member
KRISTAN O'DONNELL Board Member
CLAUDIA PERCORA Board Member
ANDRIA PINKOWSKI Board Member
SHERRY VAN METER Board Member
BILL VILLASENOR Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JAMES E R LOW Board President
BRIAN CHASE Secretary
KAPIL MAHENDRA Treasurer
DEBRA COLLETTI Board President
BARBARA WILSEY Board Member
BILL VILLASENOR Board Member
BRIAN MATTHEWS Board Member
CLAUDIA PERCORA Board Member
GABE HANZELI Board Member
GREG STANISLAWSKI Board Member
JOHN L MCDONNELL JR Board Member
KATHLEEN HUSTON Board Member
KRISTAN O'DONNELL Board Member
MARCIA HOBBS Board Member
MARIA GRANT Board Member
MICHAEL SCOTT FEELEY Board Member
MONICA FISCHBECK Board Member
SHERRY VAN METER Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
39 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 46 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A1.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 16 points below the peer median (25 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.