Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization
Acute Stabilization Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Stabilization

What does this mean?

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

The Path Forward

The Dawn

Institutionalizes the emergency protocols that saved the organization. It locks in new, rigorous governance policies to prevent a relapse into crisis.

The Dawn
The Dawn
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Stabilization
Overall
34
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Acute Stabilization

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 13.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2023 19.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 36.0% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 33.8% 22 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 20.5% 35 Fragile Recovery
2019 21.8% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 22.9% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 16.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 18.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CARA GOGER Executive Director 13.4% of Rev
JOHN STEWART Board President
JESSE CHAKRIN Board President
JAMES MASON Treasurer
LIZZ DARCY Board Member
SHANE SWEETING Secretary
FLORA SAVAGE Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
LES MARSDEN Board Member
JOHN STEWART Board Member
ALEX VANCE Board President
CHRIS THORPE Board Member
JAMES MASON Treasurer
CAROL JOHNSON Board Member
CHARLES PHILLIPS Board Member
MIKEY GORAINIK Board President
CAROL HART Secretary
CLAY RIVER Board President
FLORA SAVAGE Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
34 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 171 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 30 points above the peer median (60 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Acute Stabilization

A successful crisis intervention. After hitting the Priority Review risk tier, the organization demonstrates consecutive years of Financial Score recovery paired with Governance Score improvement.

Overall score has gone from 35 → 34 over 5 years (declining by 1 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).
  2. Stabilize program expenses or grow earned-income revenue to break the consecutive-deficit pattern (~8 points to financial score).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.