Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 44 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 58 Fragile Recovery
2019 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 45 Fragile Recovery
2017 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 49 Fragile Recovery
2013 47 Fragile Recovery
2012 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STACY JIMENEZ Board President
LAURA BENT Board President
ELSBETH IONNONE Secretary
SHANE SHIH Treasurer
CRISTINA SMART Parliamentarian

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nicole Blair Board President
Saliha Benzada Board President
Elsbeth Iannone Secretary
Douglas Stewart Treasurer
Laurie Hilt Parliamentarian

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Nicole Blair Board President
Saliha Benzada Board President
Elsbeth Iannone Secretary
Douglas Stewart Treasurer
Laurie Hilt Parliamentarian
Jennifer Suen Auditor
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 42 points above the peer median (75 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.