Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
31
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 20.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 8.9% 46 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — 7.7% 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 — — 5.5% 44 Fragile Stable Watch
2019 — — 6.4% 44 Fragile Recovery
2018 — — 3.7% 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — 4.1% 43 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 6.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 6.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 2.7% 45 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — 15.2% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 10.3% 42 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JIM BROWN Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
ANNABELLA SAKASAI Treasurer 4.6% of Rev
CONSUELO ALBA Board President —
JON AUMAN Treasurer —
ANGELA CHESNUT Board Member —
VERONICA LEON Board Member —
MARGOT HOFFMAN Secretary —
ANA MARDEN Board Member —
NADA MILKOVIC Board President —
VALERIA MIRANDA DIIRECTOR —
ALEX Santana Board Member —
JEFFREY TREVINO Board Member —
ALEX SOTO Board Member —
KATHLEEN CROCETTI Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JIM BROWN Executive Director 7.4% of Rev
ANNABELLA SAKASAI Treasurer 2.7% of Rev
CONSUELO ALBA Board Member —
JON AUMAN Treasurer —
ANGELA CHESNUT Board Member —
KATHLEEN CROCETTI Board Member —
JEFF GALIPEAUX Board Member —
JENNIFER GALLACHER Board President —
MARGOT HOFFMAN Board Member —
ANA MARDEN Board Member —
NADA MILKOVIC Board President —
VALERIA MIRANDA DIIRECTOR —
ALEX SOTO Board Member —
DIANE SYRCLE Secretary —
JEFFREY TREVINO Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
JM Brown Executive Dir. 5.8% of Rev
Michelle Williams-Vaden Former ED 3.9% of Rev
Consuelo Alba Board Member —
Jon Auman Treasurer —
Aaron Brookes Board Member —
Jeffrey Trevino Board Member —
Angela Chesnut Board Member —
Kathleen Crocetti Board Member —
Jeff Galipeaux Chairman —
Jennifer Gallacher Board Member —
Ann Hazels Board Member —
Margot Hoffman Board Member —
Nada Miljkovic Vice Chairman —
Valeria Miranda Board Member —
Alex Soto Board Member —
Diane Syrcle Secretary —
Annabelle Sakasai Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
31 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,023 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 72 points below the peer median (0 vs. 72).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

Overall score has gone from 44 → 31 over 5 years (declining by 13 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.