Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State ↑
Overall
38
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
30
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — 29.0% 38 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2023 — — 19.5% 43 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 — — 20.9% 43 Fragile Gov Risk
2021 — — 25.3% 42 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2020 — — 26.4% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2019 — — 21.1% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2018 — — 25.4% 36 Fragile Gov Risk
2017 — — 23.0% 37 Fragile Recovery
2016 — — 6.0% 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 — — 6.8% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — 42.3% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2013 — — 37.1% 21 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2012 — — 32.0% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2011 — — 27.8% 36 Fragile Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
FRANCES LEE Board President —
HALLIE HOLTZMAN Board President —
TIM SMITH Secretary —
SALLY NIELSEN Treasurer —
MAURA CHURCH Board Member —
BUCK FARMER Board Member —
RENA DAVIS Board Member —
BETTY LUK Board Member —
JUDITH STONE Board Member —
WILL WELCH Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SCOTT STAUFFER Board President —
KELSEY MENEHAN Board President —
JANE GITSCHIER Secretary —
CAROL HENRI Treasurer —
MAURA CHURCH Board Member —
BUCK FARMER Board Member —
LOUIS LAO Board Member —
SARAH JELLEY Board Member —
SUSAN POOR Board Member —
TIM SMITH Board Member —
JUDITH STONE Board Member —
FRANCES LEE Board Member —
MARTHA WESTLAND Executive Director —
SCOTT STAUFFER Board President —
HALLIE HOLTZMAN Board President —
FRANCES LEE Secretary —
CAROL HENRI Treasurer —
MAURA CHURCH Board Member —
BUCK FARMER Board Member —
SARAH JELLEY Board Member —
SUSAN POOR Board Member —
TIM SMITH Board Member —
JUDITH STONE Board Member —
WILL WELCH Board Member —
MARTHA WESTLAND Executive Director —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARTHA WESTLAND Executive Director 23.7% of Rev
DR PATRICIA BELL Board President —
KELSEY MENEHAN Board President —
SCOTT STAUFFER Secretary —
CAROL HENRI Treasurer —
MAURA CHURCH Board Member —
DEAN EBESU Board Member —
BUCK FARMER Board Member —
RITA FREIMANIS Board Member —
JANE GITSCHIER Board Member —
SARAH JELLEY Board Member —
LOUIS LAO Board Member —
JUDITH STONE Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MARTHA WESTLAND Executive Director 22.4% of Rev
DR PATRICIA BELL Board President —
KELSEY MENEHAN Board President —
SCOTT STAUFFER Secretary —
CAROL HENRI Treasurer —
DEAN EBESU Board Member —
BUCK FARMER Board Member —
RITA FREIMANIS Board Member —
SARAH JELLEY Board Member —
LOUIS LAO Board Member —
SALLY NIELSEN Board Member —
VANCE MAVERICK Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
30 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
38 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,425 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points below the peer median (30 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 29.0% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~14 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.