Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
45
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 45 Fragile Recovery
2022 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 55 Fragile Recovery
2020 45 Fragile Recovery
2019 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 61 Stable Stable Watch
2015 53 Fragile Recovery
2014 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Stan Hall Board Member
Erik Johansen Board Member
Joseph Putyrae Board Member
Louisa Louie Board Member
James Moll Board President
Michael Phulps Treasurer
Warren Jensen Secretary

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Stan Hall Board Member
Erik Johansen Board Member
Warren Jensen Board Member
Joseph Putyrae Board Member
James Moll Board President
Michael Phulps Board President
Amanda Wentz Secretary
Daniel Bond Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Stan Hall Board Member
Erik Johansen Board Member
Warren Jensen Board Member
Joseph Putyrae Board Member
James Moll Board President
Michael Phulps Board President
Amanda Wentz Secretary
Daniel Bond Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
45 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 17 points above the peer median (50 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.