Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
51
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
65
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 61 Stable Stable Watch
2021 49 Fragile Recovery
2020 45.6% 58 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 55 Fragile Recovery
2017 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 55 Fragile Recovery
2013 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 61 Stable Stable Watch
2010 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2009 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Jay Lehmann Conductor 31.2% of Rev
Julia Wilhite Manager 16.1% of Rev
Chris House Board President
Sid Hsu Treasurer
Daniel Chung Secretary
Angelina Forrest Board Member
Tonja Morria Board Member
Christina Howell Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
65 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
51 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 32 points above the peer median (65 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 55 → 51 over 5 years (declining by 4 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.