Steady State
Steady State
Steady State Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Steady State

What does this mean?

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

The Path Forward

The Stewardship

Focuses on long-term sustainability and gentle cultivation of existing resources rather than forced expansion. It honors the organization's established role as a reliable anchor.

The Stewardship
The Stewardship
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Steady State
Overall
57
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Steady State

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2023 59 Fragile Recovery
2022 58 Fragile Recovery
2021 40 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 52 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 62 Stable Stable Watch
2018 55 Fragile Recovery
2017 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 45 Fragile Recovery
2014 41 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 43 Fragile Recovery
2012 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
CLAUDIA BENIKE Board President
NANCY MURREN Board President
ESTHER TIEDEMANN Treasurer
JAY ERWIN Secretary
CLAUDIA BENIKE Board President
NANCY MURREN Board President
ESTHER TIEDERMANN Treasurer
JAY ERWIN Secretary

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MELISSA BROWN Board President
FRED SPRUELL Board President
GWEN SPRUELL Treasurer
DON DAVIDSON Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MELISSA BROWN Board President
MAUREEN WISENER Board President
ESTHER TIEDEMANN Treasurer
GWEN SPRUELL Secretary
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
57 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 57 points above the peer median (90 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Steady State

No extreme longitudinal divergence detected. The organization is maintaining its current operational philosophy.

Overall score has gone from 52 → 57 over 5 years (improving by 5 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.