Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
23
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
5
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 36.4% 23 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 21.6% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 13.7% 25 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 10.1% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 8.3% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2013 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2012 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SANDRA YOUNG Treasurer
GREGORY GREEN Board Member
LISA LORENZ Board President
JUDY LAM Board Member
SHIRLEY SISK Board Member
EVA-MARIE TISDALE Board Member
BETH RASLER Board Member
THOMAS HANDLEY Board President
AUDREY KEARNS Board President
PAUL IANNACCONE Executive Dir.
MARK GREEN Board Member
MERNA MORSE Board Member
BARBARA GORSUCH Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
PAUL IANNACCONE Executive Dir. 12.3% of Rev
PAUL IANNACCON Executive Dir. 8.8% of Rev
CARYL DOCKTER Board Member
SANDRA YOUNG Board Member
GREGORY GREEN Board Member
LISA LORENZ Board Member
JUDY LAM Board Member
SHIRLEY SISK Board Member
EVA-MARIE TISDALE Board Member
BETH RASLER Board Member
THOMAS HANDLEY Board Member
AUDREY KEARNS Board Member
MARK GREEN Board President
MERNA MORSE Board President
MARIE SMITH Treasurer
BARBARA GORSUCH Secretary
MARK GREEN Board Member
MERNA MORSE Board Member
BARBARA GORSUCH Secretary
SANDRA YOUNG Board Member
GREGORY GREEN Board Member
LISA LORENZ Board President
JUDY LAM Board Member
SHIRLEY SISK Board Member
EVA-MARIE TISDALE Board Member
BETH RASLER Treasurer
THOMAS HANDLEY Board Member
AUDREY KEARNS Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
5 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
23 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 830 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 28 points below the peer median (5 vs. 33).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 29 → 23 over 5 years (declining by 6 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 36.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~29 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.