Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↑
Overall
35
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2023 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2022 — — — 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2021 — — 8.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2020 — — 3.8% 35 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2019 — — 3.1% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2018 — — 3.2% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2017 — — 3.3% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2016 — — 3.4% 35 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2015 — — 3.6% 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2014 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2012 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETSY WOOD Board President —
CINDY WARD Board President —
LINDA J CLIFFORD Treasurer —
CINDY LAWTON Secretary —
TRISH HIGGINS Board Member —
ADONAI MACK Board Member —
HONESTO VARGAS Board Member —
CAROL WIECKOWSKI DREYER Board President —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BETSY WOOD Board President —
CINDY WARD Board President —
BETH HASSETT Treasurer —
LINDA J CLIFFORD OFFICER AT LRG —
CINDY LAWTON Secretary —
SCOT CROCKER Board Member —
THOMAS EDWARDS Board Member —
PATRICK HARBISON Board Member —
ADONAI MACK Board Member —
SUE OLSON Board Member —
KELLY POPE Board Member —
ANDREA ROGOZINSKI Board Member —
HONESTO VARGAS Board Member —
CAROL WIECKOWSKI DREYER Board President —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL LAUN Board Member 6.1% of Rev
BETSY WOOD Board President —
CINDY WARD Board President —
BETH HASSETT Treasurer —
LINDA J CLIFFORD OFFICER AT LARGE —
CINDY LAWTON Secretary —
SCOT CROCKER Board Member —
THOMAS EDWARDS Board Member —
PATRICK HARBISON Board Member —
ADONAI MACK Board Member —
SUE OLSON Board Member —
KELLY POPE Board Member —
ANDREA ROGOZINSKI Board Member —
HONESTO VARGAS Board Member —
CAROL WIECKOWSKI DREYER Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL LAUN Board Member 6.2% of Rev
CAROL WIECKOWSKI DREYER Board President —
BETSY WOOD Board President —
CINDY WARD Treasurer —
LINDA J CLIFFORD Board President —
BETH HASSET Board Member —
SUE OLSON Board Member —
KELLY POPE Board Member —
PATRICK HARBISON Board Member —
CINDY LAWTON Board Member —
VICKI JOHNSON Board Member —
SCOTT CROCKER Board Member —
THOMAS EDWARDS Board Member —
JEANENE LONERGRAN WARD Board Member —
ANDREA ROGOZINSKI Board Member —
HONESTO VARGAS Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
35 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 1,425 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 53 points below the peer median (0 vs. 53).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.