Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 16.5% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2022 23.1% 39 Fragile Recovery
2021 1.4% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 13.2% 46 Fragile Recovery
2019 20.0% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 24.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2017 6.3% 40 Fragile Recovery
2016 20.8% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 32.6% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 8.0% 46 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 25.8% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 28.7% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2011 25.1% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Cybele Gerachis Board Member 17.3% of Rev
Heidi Quan Board President
Darbi Howard Board President
Sha Coleman Treasurer
Karli Maeda Secretary
Altaf Kassam Board Member
Laura Guevara Board Member
Jennifer Biagio Board Member
Rachel Gonzales-Levine Board Member
Shawn Granberry Board Member

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Cybele Gerachis Board Member 16.5% of Rev
Heidi Quan Board President
Brian Dickerson Board President
Sha Coleman Treasurer
Karli Maeda Secretary
Altaf Kassam Board Member
Luis Argueta Board Member
Darbi Howard Board Member
Rachel Gonzales-Levine Board Member
Rebecca Rothman Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Clive Worsley Executive Director 12.9% of Rev
Cybele Gerachis Board Member 12.8% of Rev
Clive Worsley Executive Dir. 1.1% of Rev
Heidi Quan Board President
Brian Dickerson Board President
Sha Coleman Treasurer
Karli Maeda Secretary
John Howell Board Member
Kevin Davenport Board Member
Katherine Long Board Member
Luis Argueta Board Member
Heidi Quan Board President
Brian Dickerson Board President
Kevin Davenport Treasurer
Karli Maeda Secretary
John Howell Board Member
Tamara Rasberry Board Member
Sha Coleman Board Member
Katherine Long Board Member
Rich Smith Board Member
Luis Argueta Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Dominique Enriquez Executive Director 16.6% of Rev
Joel Hart Board President
Caroline Purves Board President
Susan Acquistapace Treasurer
Brian Dickerson Secretary
John Howell Board Member
Tamara Rasberry Board Member
Karli Maeda Board Member
Kevin Davenport Board Member
Rich Smith Board Member
Heidi Quan Board Member
Philip Arca Interim ED
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 12,541 other orgs in US with NTEE prefix B2.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 0 points above the peer median (85 vs. 85).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.