Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden 24 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2024 Hidden Hidden 18 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2023 Hidden Hidden 6.3% 50 Fragile Recovery
2022 14.8% 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 6.3% 50 Fragile Recovery
2020 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 49 Fragile Recovery
2012 41 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 49 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

No IRS 990 Part VII compensation data available for this organization.

Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 2,030 other orgs in US with NTEE prefix B0.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 45 points below the peer median (0 vs. 45).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

Overall score has gone from 50 → 24 over 5 years (declining by 26 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.