Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
Overall
36
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
25
Score
Program
45
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Hidden | Hidden | — | — | Unknown | — | |
| 2024 | — | — | 28.4% | 36 | Fragile | Gov Risk |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2026
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAMUEL URIEL VASQUEZ LEAL | Board Member | 28.4% of Rev | ||
| NAO BUSTAMANTE | CHAIRMAN | — | ||
| MIRIAM ROTHBART | Board President | — | ||
| BETSY GREENBERG | Secretary | — | ||
| STUART COMER | Board Member | — | ||
| KAREN HILLENBURG | Board Member | — | ||
| ULYSSES JENKINS | Board Member | — | ||
| AMELIA JONES | Board Member | — | ||
| PAUL MCCARTHY | Board Member | — | ||
| XANDRO SEGADE | Board Member | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
25 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
36 / 100
Priority Review
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 43 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A5.
Most-divergent component: financial score sits 15 points below the peer median (25 vs. 40).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
What's driving this score
- Comp-to-revenue ratio of 28.4% is modestly above the sector's healthy band (18–22%) — worth monitoring.
- Financial resilience score in the bottom quartile — reserves and liabilities ratios warrant review.
What would change this score
The two changes that would most improve this score:
- Reduce top-officer compensation from 28.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~13 points.
- Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.