Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
24
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 29.1% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2022 — — — 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 39.7% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 30.1% 50 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 — — 23.1% 37 Fragile Gov Risk
2018 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 — — — 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2015 — — — 57 Fragile Recovery
2014 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 49 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2011 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATTHEW FERNANDEZ Executive Dir. 29.1% of Rev
KATHY J FERNANDEZ Board President —
LUCY CONNER Board Member —
CRISTY WILLER Secretary —
STEPHANIE SMOOT Board Member —
SHAYLYN GOARD Board Member —
LINDA BENSON Board Member —
BRIAN SAYLOR Board Member —
DOUGLAS CAUSEY Board Member —
KALB STEVENSON Treasurer —
JANA LAGE Board Member —
JEROMEE MYERS Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATTHEW FERNANDEZ Executive Dir. 24.9% of Rev
MATTHEW FERNANDEZ Executive Dir. 22.8% of Rev
KATHY J FERNANDEZ Board President —
MIKE ZOSKE Board President —
CRISTY WILLER Secretary —
DAVID FRITZ Treasurer —
LUCY CONNER Board Member —
LINDA BENSON Board Member —
BRIAN SAYLOR Board Member —
DOUGLAS CAUSEY Board Member —
JANA LAGE Board Member —
RICHARD REICHMAN Board Member —
KATHY J FERNANDEZ Board President —
MIKE ZOSKE Board President —
CRISTY WILLER Secretary —
DAVID FRITZ Treasurer —
RACHAEL MIDDLETON Board Member —
LINDA BENSON Board Member —
BRIAN SAYLOR Board Member —
DOUGLAS CAUSEY Board Member —
TODD SHERWOOD Board Member —
JANA LAGE Board Member —
JOEL NEIMEYER Board Member —
RICHARD REICHMAN Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MATTHEW FERNANDEZ Executive Dir. 19.1% of Rev
KATHY J FERNANDEZ Board President —
MIKE ZOSKE Board President —
CRISTY WILLER Secretary —
DAVID FRITZ Treasurer —
RACHAEL MIDDLETON Board Member —
LINDA BENSON Board Member —
BRIAN SAYLOR Board Member —
DOUGLAS CAUSEY Board Member —
TODD SHERWOOD Board Member —
JANA LAGE Board Member —
JOEL NEIMEYER Board Member —
RICHARD REICHMAN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
24 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 37 other orgs in AK with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 45 points below the peer median (0 vs. 45).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 29.1% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~14 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.