Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation
Institutional Maturation Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Institutional Maturation

What does this mean?

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

The Path Forward

The Crown

A mandate to lead the sector. It encourages the organization to mentor emerging nonprofits and embark on generational capital projects, leveraging their profound stability.

The Crown
The Crown
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Institutional Maturation
Overall
55
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Institutional Maturation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 2.0% 55 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 4.8% 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 21.1% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 16.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 15.2% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2018 9.8% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 10.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 9.1% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2015 12.6% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 5.7% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 36 Financially Distressed Recovery
2012 15.4% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 13.6% 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael Holtmann Board President 2.2% of Rev
Christopher Evans Board Member 1.9% of Rev
Erin Branagan Board Member 1.8% of Rev
Dan Lau Board Member 1.6% of Rev
Mark Hauber Board Member 1.6% of Rev
Winona Mackell Operations Dir 1.5% of Rev
Olivia E Sears Board President
Barbara Paschke Board President
Caroline West Treasurer
Michael Carabetta Board Member
Robin Pille Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael Holtmann Board Member 2.0% of Rev
Michael Holtmann Board Member 1.9% of Rev
Christopher Evans Board Member 1.7% of Rev
Erin Branagan Dev And Comm Direc 1.7% of Rev
Christopher Evans Board Member 1.7% of Rev
Erin Branagan Dev And Comm Direc 1.6% of Rev
Olivia E Sears Board President
Barbara Paschke Board President
Caroline West Treasurer
Michael Carabetta Board Member
Robin Pille Board Member
Olivia E Sears Board President
Barbara Paschke Board President
Caroline West Treasurer
Michael Carabetta Board Member
Robin Pille Board Member
Stephen Sparks Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael Holtmann Board Member 1.9% of Rev
CJ Evans Board Member 1.6% of Rev
Olivia E Sears Board President
Barbara Paschke Board President
Caroline West Treasurer
Michael Carabetta Board Member
Robin Pille Board Member
Stephen Sparks Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Michael Holtmann Board Member 1.8% of Rev
CJ Evans Board Member 1.5% of Rev
Olivia E Sears Board President
Barbara Paschke Board President
Caroline West Treasurer
Michael Carabetta Board Member
Robin Pille Board Member
Stephen Sparks Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 171 other orgs in CA with NTEE prefix A2.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 30 points above the peer median (60 vs. 30).

5-year trend: Institutional Maturation

The gold standard. 10-year slow, steady, concurrent growth across Financial Health, Governance, and Program. Leadership is scaling their oversight and impact in lockstep.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.