Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
85
Score
Governance
85
Score
Financial
80
Score
Program
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2024 Hidden Hidden 24.0% 38 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2023 Hidden Hidden 47 Fragile Recovery
2022 76.7% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2021 76.7% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2019 57 Fragile Recovery
2018 53 Fragile Recovery
2017 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 31 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2013 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 51 Fragile Recovery
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Christie Jones Executive Director 24.0% of Rev
Vern VanHouten Board Member
Martina Mascali Board Member
Shannon Perry Board President
Clarissa Solomon Secretary
Anna Downen Treasurer

Tax year 2024

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 12.0% of Rev

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 8.0% of Rev
STEWART HAKE CONDUCTOR 5.1% of Rev
MATTHEW UNDERWOOD CONDUCTOR 5.1% of Rev
NOELLE BRAMBILA Executive Director 3.0% of Rev
JENNIFER YOUNG Board President
NAOMI TRUITT Board President
ROBERT FISHER Treasurer
PAULA VANDERPOEL Secretary
KARLA EPPERSON Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
STEWART HAKE CONDUCTOR 5.1% of Rev
MATTHEW UNDERWOOD Board Member 5.1% of Rev
NOELLE BRAMBILA Executive Director 4.5% of Rev
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 2.5% of Rev
KARLA EPPERSON Board Member 1.3% of Rev
JENNIE YOUNG Board President
NAOMI TRUITT Board President
ROBERT FISHER Treasurer
PAULA VANDERPOEL Secretary
JENNY YOUNG Board President
NAOMI TRUITT Board President
ROBERT FISHER Treasurer
PAULA VANDERPOEL Secretary

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 2.5% of Rev

Tax year 2019

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 7.4% of Rev

Tax year 2018

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 6.4% of Rev

Tax year 2017

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 9.9% of Rev

Tax year 2016

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 9.8% of Rev

Tax year 2015

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 8.8% of Rev

Tax year 2014

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 8.8% of Rev

Tax year 2013

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 8.7% of Rev

Tax year 2012

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 8.2% of Rev

Tax year 2011

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
XML Data Pending Top Officer (Est.) 7.9% of Rev
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
80 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
85 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
0 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
85 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 236 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 39 points above the peer median (80 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.