Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction
Programmatic Contraction Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Programmatic Contraction

What does this mean?

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

The Path Forward

The Rainmaker

Represents the forced release of hoarded resources back into the community. It acts as a pressure valve against administrative capture, ensuring the mission takes priority over the machine.

The Rainmaker
The Rainmaker
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Programmatic Contraction
Overall
57
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
90
Score
Program
15
Score

Institutional Epochs

2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Programmatic Contraction

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2022 58 Fragile Recovery
2021 52 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Robert McKenzieSullivan Board Member
Isaac McKenzieSullivan Artistic Director
Courtney Stanley Board President
Tim Butterfield Board President
John O'Conner Treasurer
Vesta Loomis Secretary
Jenny Hall Board Member
Michael Ready Board Member
Clara Keller Board Member
Willow Miller Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Robert McKenzieSullivan Board Member
Isaac McKenzieSullivan Artistic Director
Michael Ready Board President
Tim Butterfield Board President
Robert McKenzieSullivan Board Member
John O'Conner Treasurer
Isaac McKenzieSullivan Artistic Director
Courtney Stanley Secretary
Michael Ready Board President
Jenny Hall Board Member
Tim Butterfield Board President
Vesta Loomis Board Member
Jenny Hall Treasurer
Clara Keller Board Member
Courtney Stanley Secretary
Eileen McKenzieSullivan Board Member
Veronica Haworth Board Member
Vesta Loomis Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
90 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
15 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
57 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 235 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 50 points above the peer median (90 vs. 40).

5-year trend: Programmatic Contraction

Total revenue is stable, but the percentage of expenses spent on actual mission shrinks. Indicates administrative bloat and spending on the machinery of raising money rather than the art itself.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.