Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↑
Overall
55
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
75
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden — 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2022 — — 5.7% 63 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 40.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Gov Risk
2020 — — 33.9% 38 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2019 — — — 39 Fragile Decline Risk
2018 — — — 55 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — — 43 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — — 55 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 51 Fragile Decline Risk
2014 — — — 55 Fragile Recovery
2013 — — — 47 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 — — — 51 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ABIGAIL HANSON Board President 2.3% of Rev
BRETT MADDEN Board Member 1.4% of Rev
BROOK HOFSTETTER Board Member 1.2% of Rev
MASON BEAVER Board Member 0.8% of Rev
ANGELYN HARRIS Board Member 0.7% of Rev
STACY YOUGQUIST Board Member 0.5% of Rev
RIA PETH Board President —
LEISHA SKINNER Secretary —
DAN TOOMEY Treasurer —
MYLES DOORN Board Member —
CAROLE LEANDER Board Member —
MARTHA PORTEOUS Board Member —
TORI STEINER Board Member —
KIM TURNER Board Member —
SUSAN WATSON Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ABIGAIL HANSON Board President 1.4% of Rev
RIA PETH Board President 1.1% of Rev
CAROL LEANDER Board Member 0.5% of Rev
KIM TURNER Board Member 0.5% of Rev
BROOKE HOFSTETTER Board Member 0.5% of Rev
STACY YOUNGQUIST Board Member 0.4% of Rev
DANIEL TOOMEY Treasurer 0.3% of Rev
ANGELYN HARRIS Board Member 0.2% of Rev
SUSAN WATSON Board Member 0.1% of Rev
LEISHA SKINNER Secretary —
HAROLD PAGE Board Member —
MYLES DOORN Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
RIA PETH Treasurer 0.8% of Rev
ABIGAIL HANSON Secretary 0.7% of Rev
KIM TURNER Board Member 0.7% of Rev
SOPHIA PRICE Board President 0.5% of Rev
LEISHA SKINNER Board Member 0.3% of Rev
HAROLD PAGE Board Member 0.1% of Rev
MATTHEW BIANCONI Board President —
SUSAN WATSON Board Member —
CAROL LEANDER Board Member —
KEVIN COBLEY Board Member —
ANGELYN HARRIS Board Member —
COLBY PLAGGE Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ABIGAIL HANSON Secretary 0.1% of Rev
MATTHEW BIANCONI Board President —
RIA PETH Treasurer —
HAROLD PAGE Board President —
SUSAN WATSON Board Member —
JANN BAREM Board Member —
CAROL LEANDER Board Member —
KEVIN COBLEY Board Member —
AMANDA CURTIS Board Member —
KIM TURNER Board Member —
ANGELYN HARRIS Board Member —
SOPHIA PRICE Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
AMANDA CURTIS Board Member 1.6% of Rev
RIA VANDERPOOL Board President —
DANIEL TOOMEY Treasurer —
HAROLD PAGE Board President —
MATTHEW BIANCONI Secretary —
JANE SKINNER Board Member —
SUSAN WATSON Board Member —
JANN BAREM Board Member —
CAROL LEANDER Board Member —
KEVIN COBLEY Board Member —
KIM TURNER Board Member —
ANGELYN HARRIS Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
75 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
55 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 332 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 23 points above the peer median (75 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.