Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag ↑
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden — 52 Fragile Recovery
2022 — — — 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 — — 7.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 8.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 — — — 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 — — — 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Deana Duncan Artistic Director 6.0% of Rev
Aaron Simpson Board Member —
Judy Morton Board Member —
Thomas Hall Board Member —
Joann Quintana Board Member —
Peter Ehrlichman Board Member —
Marion Jouas Board Member —
Catherine James Board Member —
Ann McDonald Board Member —
Dean Olmstead Board Member —
Bobbe Bridge Board Member —
Robert McClain Board Member —
Michele Venetis Board Member —
John Meyer Board Member —
ROBERT MCCLAIN Board Member —
MICHELE VENETIS Board Member —
LOUIS MUNIZ Board Member —
JOANN QUINTANA Board Member —
PATRICIA FRIEDMAN Board Member —
DEAN OLMSTEAD Board Member —
ANN MCDONALD Board Member —
JOHN MEYER Board Member —
BOBBE BRIDGE Board President —
PETER EHRLICHMAN BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE —
CATHY JAMES Treasurer —
THOMAS HALL Secretary —
DEANA DUNCAN Artistic Director —
WILLIAM TIERNEY Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Verna Everitt Executive Director 5.6% of Rev
Judy Morton Board Member —
Dean Olmstead Board Member —
Ann McDonald Board Member —
John Meyer Board Member —
Michele Venetis Board Member —
Kathleen Wilson Board Member —
Ken Pilcher Board Member —
Aaron Simpson Board Member —
Robert McClain Board Member —
Kathleen Conroy Board Member —
Bobbe Bridge Board Member —
Margaret Anderson Board Member —
Marly Eidsness Board Member —
Marion Jouas Board Member —
Catherine James Board Member —
Thomas Hall Board Member —
Robert Merry Board President —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BOBBE BRIDGE Board Member —
KATHLEEN CONROY Board Member —
DR MARLY EIDSNESS Board Member —
MARION JOUAS Board Member —
KAREN LEEDS Board Member —
ROBERT MCCLAIN Board Member —
ANN MCDONALD Board Member —
JOHN MEYER Board Member —
DEAN OLMSTEAD Board Member —
AARON SIMPSON Board Member —
MICHELE PANELLI-VENETIS Board Member —
KATHY WILSON Board Member —
ROBERT MERRY Board President —
JUDY MORTON Board President —
THOM HALL Treasurer —
DERBRA CAMPBELL Secretary —
KEN PILCHER Board President —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 332 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

Overall score has gone from 35 → 52 over 5 years (improving by 17 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.