Governance Lag
Governance Lag
Governance Lag Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Stable
Trajectory Thumbprint

Governance Lag

What does this mean?

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

The Path Forward

The Scaffold

Brings immediate structural maturity. It represents the necessity of outside, independent oversight to manage new scale, breaking the echo chamber of a founding 'friends and family' board.

The Scaffold
The Scaffold
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Governance Lag
Overall
52
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Governance Lag

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 52 Fragile Recovery
2022 52 Fragile Recovery
2021 7.6% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 8.4% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2019 35 Financially Distressed Recovery
2018 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2017 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2016 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2015 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 42 Financially Distressed Recovery
2013 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2011 36 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Deana Duncan Artistic Director 6.0% of Rev
Aaron Simpson Board Member
Judy Morton Board Member
Thomas Hall Board Member
Joann Quintana Board Member
Peter Ehrlichman Board Member
Marion Jouas Board Member
Catherine James Board Member
Ann McDonald Board Member
Dean Olmstead Board Member
Bobbe Bridge Board Member
Robert McClain Board Member
Michele Venetis Board Member
John Meyer Board Member
ROBERT MCCLAIN Board Member
MICHELE VENETIS Board Member
LOUIS MUNIZ Board Member
JOANN QUINTANA Board Member
PATRICIA FRIEDMAN Board Member
DEAN OLMSTEAD Board Member
ANN MCDONALD Board Member
JOHN MEYER Board Member
BOBBE BRIDGE Board President
PETER EHRLICHMAN BOARD EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
CATHY JAMES Treasurer
THOMAS HALL Secretary
DEANA DUNCAN Artistic Director
WILLIAM TIERNEY Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Verna Everitt Executive Director 5.6% of Rev
Judy Morton Board Member
Dean Olmstead Board Member
Ann McDonald Board Member
John Meyer Board Member
Michele Venetis Board Member
Kathleen Wilson Board Member
Ken Pilcher Board Member
Aaron Simpson Board Member
Robert McClain Board Member
Kathleen Conroy Board Member
Bobbe Bridge Board Member
Margaret Anderson Board Member
Marly Eidsness Board Member
Marion Jouas Board Member
Catherine James Board Member
Thomas Hall Board Member
Robert Merry Board President

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
BOBBE BRIDGE Board Member
KATHLEEN CONROY Board Member
DR MARLY EIDSNESS Board Member
MARION JOUAS Board Member
KAREN LEEDS Board Member
ROBERT MCCLAIN Board Member
ANN MCDONALD Board Member
JOHN MEYER Board Member
DEAN OLMSTEAD Board Member
AARON SIMPSON Board Member
MICHELE PANELLI-VENETIS Board Member
KATHY WILSON Board Member
ROBERT MERRY Board President
JUDY MORTON Board President
THOM HALL Treasurer
DERBRA CAMPBELL Secretary
KEN PILCHER Board President
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
52 / 100
Stable

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 235 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: program score sits 28 points above the peer median (60 vs. 32).

5-year trend: Governance Lag

Revenue and Program Scale spike rapidly, but the Governance Score remains stagnant. The organization has outgrown its founding era but hasn't installed proper oversight.

Overall score has gone from 35 → 52 over 5 years (improving by 17 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.