Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift ↓
Overall
46
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 — — 33.4% 46 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2023 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2022 — — 56.3% 54 Governance-Stressed Recovery
2021 — — 64.2% 42 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2020 — — 65.0% 54 Governance-Stressed Gov Risk
2019 — — — 65 Stable Stable Watch
2018 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2017 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2015 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 — — — 57 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch
2012 — — — 57 Fragile Decline Risk
2011 — — — 61 Stable Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sarah Hopkins Executive Director 20.4% of Rev
Jaclin Cummings Artistic Director 13.0% of Rev
Bruce Chesterman Board President —
Lydia Newell Board President —
Sandra Hansen Treasurer —
Su Meredith Secretary —
Sarah Hendron Board Member —
Ruth Seignemartin Board Member —
Riley Wing Board Member —
Melissa Narrance Board Member —
Gregory Burrill Board Member —
Rebecca Chesterman Board Member —
Nikki McNurlen Board Member —
Cody Filby Board Member —
Alina Murcar Board Member —
Samson Lyman Board Member —
Stephen Thurgood Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sarah Hopkins Executive Director 19.4% of Rev
Jaclin Cummings Artistic Director 12.1% of Rev
Gordon Ritchie Board President —
Bruce Chesterman Board President —
Lydia Newell Treasurer —
Sandra Hansen Secretary —
Heather Ritchie Board Member —
Rebecca Chesterman Board Member —
Su Meredith Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sarah Hopkins Executive Director 19.4% of Rev
Jaclin Cummings Artistic Director 12.1% of Rev
Gordon Ritchie Board President —
Bruce Chesterman Board President —
Lydia Newell Treasurer —
Angela Amos Secretary —
Heather Easterling Ritchie Board Member —
Beth Torgerson Board Member —
Rebecca Chesterman Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sarah Hopkins Executive Director 19.4% of Rev
Judy Hafso Artistic Director 11.4% of Rev
Gordon Ritchie Board President —
Heather Easterling Ritchie Board Member —
Bruce Chesterman Board President —
Rebecca Chesterman Board Member —
Lydia Newell Treasurer —
Angela Little Secretary —
Beth Torgerson Trustees —
Verne Windham Board Member —
Ruth Seignemartin Board Member —
Miranda Chesterman Board Member —
Ann Benson Board Member —
Ellen Maccarone Board Member —
Leah Ann Howard Board Member —
Kris Hendron Board Member —
Kristina Ploeger-Hekmatpanah Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
46 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 333 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 18 points below the peer median (42 vs. 60).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 33.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~23 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.