Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↓
Overall
18
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 22.8% 18 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 16.5% 24 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2021 — — 23.0% 20 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2020 — — 24.6% 16 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 12.9% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 13.9% 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2017 — — — 49 Fragile Stable Watch
2016 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — — 41 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2014 — — — 45 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 — — — 45 Fragile Recovery
2012 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2011 — — — 35 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
INEZ MAUBANE JONES Executive Director 39.2% of Rev
MIKE LEWARS Treasurer —
LINDA SEMILTZ Board President —
STEPHANIE REESE Board Member —
LINDA KRAMER Secretary —
GINNY KAUL Board Member —
SARA OTEPKA Board Member —
JEFF TRABUCCO Board Member —
JEAN-CLAUDE LOUIS Board President —
MIKE KAUL Board Member —
LINDA K JENNING Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
INEZ MAUBANE JONES Executive Director 33.7% of Rev
MIKE LEWARS Treasurer —
LINDA SEMILTZ Board President —
STEPHANIE REESE Board Member —
LINDA KRAMER Secretary —
GINNY KAUL Board Member —
SARA OTEPKA Board Member —
JEFF TRABUCCO Board Member —
JEAN-CLAUDE LOUIS Board President —
MIKE KAUL Board Member —
LINDA K JENNING Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
ANNE SMART Executive Director 23.9% of Rev
MIKE LEWARS Treasurer —
LINDA SEMILTZ Board President —
CLAIRE HICKS Board Member —
STEPHANIE REESE Board Member —
LINDA KRAMER Secretary —
GINNY KAUL Board Member —
SARA OTEPKA Board Member —
JEFF TRABUCCO Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
18 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 333 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 52 points below the peer median (0 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 31 → 18 over 5 years (declining by 13 points). A multi-year directional move of this magnitude is a signal worth investigating.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.