Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit
Overall
29
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 11.5% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 0.1% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 0.1% 39 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 0.2% 37 Financially Distressed Stable Watch
2019 0.2% 37 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 0.3% 41 Financially Distressed Recovery
2017 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2014 29 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2013 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 33 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
IGOR SHAKHMNA Executive Director 11.2% of Rev
MICHAEL LIU MD Board Member 0.3% of Rev
CAROL VAN NATTA CHAIRMAN
ANN BARDACKE Board Member
DAVID BLOOM MD Board Member
TAMMY BLOOM MD Board Member
PAUL CHRISTENSEN Board Member
RUSS GOCHNEAUR Board Member
CHARLENE HISS Board Member
KEN KIRN Board Member
TIM KRAFT Board Member
STEVEN MCCARTHY Board Member
DAVID SMITH MD Board Member
VICTORIA TULLETT Board Member
CRAIG BREESE Board Member

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL LIU MD Board Member 0.1% of Rev
VICTORIA TULLETT CHAIRMAN
ANN BARDACKE Board Member
CAROL VAN NATTA Board Member
DAVID BLOOM MD Board Member
DAVID SMITH MD Board Member
PAUL CHRISTENSEN Board Member
STEVEN MCCARTHY Board Member
TAMMY BLOOM MD Board Member
TIM KRAFT Board Member
CHARLENE HISS Board Member
KEN KIRN Board Member

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
MICHAEL LIU MD Board Member 0.1% of Rev
VICTORIA TULLETT CHAIRMAN
AMEY LAUD Board Member
ANN BARDACKE Board Member
BARBARA COMAN Board Member
CAROL VAN NATTA Board Member
DAVID BLOOM MD Board Member
DAVID SMITH MD Board Member
PAUL CHRISTENSEN Board Member
STEVEN MCCARTHY Board Member
TAMMY BLOOM MD Board Member
TIM KRAFT Board Member
WILL KITCHEN Board Member

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DR MICHAEL LIU MD Board Member 0.1% of Rev
KATHRYN L MCDONALD CHAIRMAN
VICTORIA TULLETT VICE-CHAIRMAN
PAUL CHRISTENSEN Board Member
WILL KITCHEN Board Member
AMEY LAUD Board Member
DIMITRI ZGHENTI Board Member
DAVID BLOOM Board Member
TAMMY BLOOM Board Member
JAKE GAMBLE Board Member
CAROL VAN ATTA Board Member
JUSTIN JENKS Board Member
TAYLOR ANDERSON Board Member
STEVEN MCCARTHY Board Member
JAN KENNEDY Board Member
TIM KRAFT Board Member
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 236 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 41 points below the peer median (0 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.