Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence
Acute Resource Divergence Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Acute Resource Divergence

What does this mean?

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

The Path Forward

The Realignment

Forces immediate balancing of administrative bloat against actual programmatic output. It demands that every dollar extracted for overhead be justified by community impact.

The Realignment
The Realignment
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Acute Resource Divergence ↓
Overall
29
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Resource Divergence

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 Hidden Hidden 22.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 9.9% 36 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2021 — — 8.0% 40 Financially Distressed Recovery
2020 — — 8.0% 38 Financially Distressed Recovery
2019 — — 15.9% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 4.5% 45 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 6.9% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2016 — — 6.2% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2015 — — 7.3% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch
2014 — — 7.6% 34 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — — 32 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — — 34 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2011 — — — 38 Financially Distressed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sharon Nyree Williams Executive Director 9.8% of Rev
Stephanie Guiland Executive Director 8.6% of Rev
Donald Byrd Executive Director 8.0% of Rev
Gavin Reub Board President —
April Magen Secretary —
Michael Hebb Board Member —
Joanna Lau Board Member —
Linda Lowry Board Member —
Shawn Roberts Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Donald Byrd Executive Director 9.1% of Rev
Sharon Nyree Williams Executive Director 7.0% of Rev
Stephanie Guiland Executive Director 6.7% of Rev
Randy Engstrom Board President —
Gavin Reub Treasurer —
April Magen Secretary —
Michael Hebb Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Tera Beach Executive Director 13.0% of Rev
Josh LaBelle Board President —
Gavin Reub Treasurer —
Crystal Brown Secretary —
Riall Johnson Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Tera Beach Executive Director 11.7% of Rev
Josh LaBelle Board President —
Gavin Reub Treasurer —
Crystal Brown Secretary —
Glenn Nelson Board Member —
Riall Johnson Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Tera Beach Executive Director 12.0% of Rev
Donald Byrd Artistic Director 8.7% of Rev
Ricard B Nelson Board Member —
Sun McEldery Board Member —
Benita Bunni Thomas Board Member —
Samantha Nyhan Secretary —
Josh LaBelle Board President —
Russ Stromberg II Treasurer —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 332 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 52 points below the peer median (0 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Acute Resource Divergence

Revenue is contracting significantly, but executive compensation percentage is rising. The organization is refusing to adjust its administrative overhead to match its new economic reality.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.