Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit
Structural Deficit Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Structural Deficit

What does this mean?

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

The Path Forward

The Truth-Teller

Forces necessary, painful cuts to preserve the core. It demands that the organization stop borrowing from its future and align its current programmatic output with actual sustainable revenue.

The Truth-Teller
The Truth-Teller
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Structural Deficit ↓
Overall
29
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Structural Deficit

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 Hidden Hidden 20.3% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2022 — — 21.2% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2021 — — 35.4% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2020 — — 25.2% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2019 — — 16.8% 29 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2018 — — 21.4% 33 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2017 — — 18.2% 31 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2016 — — 23.7% 27 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2015 — — 18.2% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2014 — — 27.0% 30 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2013 — — 19.6% 28 Critical Intervention Needed Decline Risk
2012 — — 10.7% 35 Critical Intervention Needed Recovery
2011 — — 10.1% 32 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
SARA BOOS Artistic Director 7.9% of Rev
JILL CLYMER Executive Director 7.3% of Rev
ANDREW SEIFERT Artistic Director 6.2% of Rev
LAURA HOPPER Board President —
KAREN FOSSUM Board President —
CHRISTINE PEREZ Secretary —
JASON ROGERS Treasurer —
TERA SCHREIBER Board President —
NIDHI AGRAWAL Board Member —
RYAN BUCKMASTER Board Member —
KAELI GRANT Board Member —
BECKY KELLEY Board Member —
DYLAN KINARD Board Member —
EMILY LI Board Member —
JENNIFER LUND Board Member —
ANNA SHOPE Board Member —
BINA SHUKLA Board Member —
JOSEPH TO Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sara Boos Artistic Director 10.0% of Rev
Jill Clymer Executive Dir. 7.4% of Rev
Tera Schreiber Board President —
Jason Rogers Board President —
Rachel Engrissei Secretary —
Cydly Smith Treasurer —
Kaeli Grant Board Member —
Matthew Hinck Board Member —
Laura Hopper Board Member —
Becky Kelley Board Member —
Dylan Kinard Board Member —
Emily Li Board Member —
Jennifer Lund Board Member —
Bina Shukla Board Member —
Ericka Thielke Board Member —
Joseph To Board Member —

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Sara Boos Artistic Director 9.5% of Rev
Jill Clymer Executive Dir. 7.0% of Rev
Tera Schreiber Board President —
Rachel Engrissei Board President —
Jason Rogers Secretary —
Cydly Smith Treasurer —
Lina Fine Board Member —
Matthew Hinck Board Member —
Laura Hopper Board Member —
Elizabeth Kain Board Member —
Becky Kelley Board Member —
Vanessa Miller Board Member —
David Sweeney Board Member —
Ericka Thielke Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
29 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 332 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 52 points below the peer median (0 vs. 52).

5-year trend: Structural Deficit

Persistently low financial health over 5 years despite strong programmatic output. They are borrowing from their future (or bleeding an endowment) to pay for today's programs.

Overall score has gone from 29 → 29 over 5 years (stable by 0 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Build cash reserves to at least 3 months of operating expenses — moves financial resilience score meaningfully (~10 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.