Mission Drift
Mission Drift
Mission Drift Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Mission Drift

What does this mean?

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

The Path Forward

The Lodestar

A radical recommitment to the core mission. It requires the organization to gain the strength to say 'no' to restricted funding that pulls them away from their true purpose.

The Lodestar
The Lodestar
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Mission Drift
Overall
50
Score
Governance
58
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
30
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Mission Drift

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2024 Hidden Hidden Unknown
2023 Hidden Hidden 3.6% 50 Financially Distressed Recovery
2022 55 Fragile Recovery
2021 37 Fragile Decline Risk
2020 4.2% 58 Fragile Recovery
2019 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2018 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2017 51 Fragile Recovery
2016 47 Fragile Decline Risk
2015 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2014 51 Fragile Stable Watch
2013 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2012 47 Fragile Stable Watch
2011 47 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mallory Morrison Business Manager 3.6% of Rev
Mallory Morrison Artistic Director
Rebecca Jorgensen Board President
Tammy Starkes Board President
Hailey Maddox Secretary
Dustin Dailey Treasurer
Nicole Cisler Artistic Director

Tax year 2021

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Mallory Morrison Business Mgr 3.6% of Rev
Lawan Morrison Art Dir
Mallory Morrison Board Member
Jen Matson Board President
Tammy Starks Board President
Hailey Summerday Secretary
Kristina Zurbrugg Treasurer
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
58 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
30 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
50 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 235 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 14 points above the peer median (55 vs. 41).

5-year trend: Mission Drift

Highly volatile revenue swings year over year paired with fluctuating Program Scores. The organization is constantly pivoting to chase restricted grant funding rather than building a sustainable core.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.