Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle
Compensation Escalation Cycle Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Developing
Trajectory Thumbprint

Compensation Escalation Cycle

What does this mean?

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

The Path Forward

The Steward

Re-establishes board supremacy over executive extraction. It freezes compensation and mandates that all future financial rewards be tied strictly to verifiable mission expansion.

The Steward
The Steward
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle ↑
Overall
48
Score
Governance
45
Score
Financial
50
Score
Program
60
Score

Institutional Epochs

2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Compensation Escalation

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2023 — — 24.4% 48 Fragile Gov Risk
2022 — — 5.6% 54 Fragile Decline Risk
2021 — — 9.2% 48 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2020 — — 8.3% 54 Fragile Decline Risk
2019 — — 6.7% 50 Financially Distressed Decline Risk
2018 — — 4.0% 55 Fragile Recovery
2017 — — 6.6% 48 Fragile Decline Risk
2016 — — 2.1% 54 Fragile Recovery
2015 — — 13.6% 47 Fragile Gov Risk
2014 — — 6.4% 52 Fragile Gov Risk
2013 — — 1.0% 55 Fragile Decline Risk
2012 — — 5.2% 56 Fragile Recovery
2011 — — 2.4% 53 Fragile Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID SETFORD Executive Director 16.4% of Rev
SHANNON ROLBIECKI Board Member 10.9% of Rev
JONATHAN SMITH Treasurer 8.6% of Rev
JEFF WILLIAMS Board President —
PAMELA TRANSUE Board President —
DONA PONEPINTO Board President —
JACQUELINE JUSTICE Secretary —
TINA ORR-CAHALL Treasurer —
CONNIE WILLIS Board President —
BERNAL BACA Board Member —
BROOKE BENAROYA DICKSON Board Member —
MATTHEW BERGMAN Board Member —
ISIAAH CRAWFORD Board Member —
KLAIR ETHRIDGE Board Member —
MEAGAN FOLEY Board Member —
ADDISON GREGORY Board Member —
JAIME HARMAN Board Member —
LISA HOLDERMAN Board Member —
ANNIE KILCUP Board Member —
MICHAEL MARTINEZ Board Member —
ALI MODARRES Board Member —
GARY OWEN Board Member —
KIM PARRIS Board Member —
BETH PERROW Board Member —
SHAUN PETERSON Board Member —
MOLLY REGIMBAL Board Member —
MANNY SANTIAGO Board Member —
CHRIS SPADAFORE Board Member —
HOAN TRAN Board Member —

Tax year 2022

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
DAVID SETFORD Executive Director 15.4% of Rev
JONATHANS SMITH Treasurer 8.2% of Rev
CONNIE WILLIS Board President —
JEFF WILLIAMS Board President —
PAMELA TRANSUE Board President —
LISA QUIGG Secretary —
TINA ORR-CAHALL Treasurer —
BILL DRISCOLL Board President —
MATT BERGMAN Board Member —
ANTHONY CHEN Board Member —
ISIAAH CRAWFORD Board Member —
BROOKE BENAROYA DICKSON Board Member —
MEAGAN FOLEY Board Member —
ADDISON GREGORY Board Member —
SUSIE RUSSELL HALL Board Member —
JAIME HARMAN Board Member —
GEORG HAUB Board Member —
LISA HOLDERMAN Board Member —
JACQUELINE JUSTICE Board Member —
ANNE KILCUP Board Member —
MICHAEL MARTINEZ Board Member —
ALI MODARRES Board Member —
MAGGIE O'BRIEN Board Member —
GARY OWEN Board Member —
KIM PARRIS Board Member —
BETH PERROW Board Member —
SHAUN PETERSON Board Member —
DONA PONEPINTO Board Member —
MOLLY REGIMBAL Board Member —
DIANNE STOEHR Board Member —
WENDY GRIFFIN Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
50 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
45 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
60 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
48 / 100
Developing

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 90 other orgs in WA with NTEE prefix A5.

Most-divergent component: governance score sits 35 points below the peer median (45 vs. 80).

5-year trend: Compensation Escalation Cycle

Revenue grows modestly, but top officer compensation grows consistently for 5 years, breaching danger zones. The executive is negotiating aggressive raises against a compliant board.

Overall score has gone from 50 → 48 over 5 years (declining by 2 points).

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).
  2. Reduce top-officer compensation from 24.4% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~5 points.

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.