Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data
Market
Archetype
Mechanical
Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint
Insufficient Data
What does this mean?
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Institutional Health Scores
5-yr trend: Insufficient Data ↓
Overall
41
Score
Governance
50
Score
Financial
55
Score
Program
5
Score
Title
-
Institutions
-
Avg Revenue
-
Risk Profile
Representative Institutions
Institutional Epochs
2021
2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data
Historical Performance
| Year | Revenue | Top Comp | Comp % Rev | Score | Phase Label | Outlook | Details |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | — | — | — | 41 | Fragile | Decline Risk | |
| 2022 | — | — | — | 50 | Fragile | Stable Watch |
Officer compensation history
Tax year 2023
| Name | Title | Phone | Compensation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROGER JOHNSON | Board President | — | ||
| GREG BATTS | Board President | — | ||
| JACQUETTA STEPHEN | Treasurer | — | ||
| KATHY BATTS | Secretary | — | ||
| JAKE HERSHBERGER | Board Member | — | ||
| LARRY CAIN | Board Member | — | ||
| ROSE GREAR | Board Member | — | ||
| DAVE RALSTON | Board Member | — | ||
| BRANDI LITTLE | Board Member | — | ||
| SCOTT GALLAGHER | Board Member | — | ||
| JIMMY GREAR | Board Member | — | ||
| KRISTAL MCGEE | Board Member | — | ||
| LUKE JOHNSON | Board Member | — |
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown
Score breakdown
Financial resilience
55 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
50 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
5 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
41 / 100
Priority Review
The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →
Peer comparison
Compared to 212 other orgs in OH with NTEE prefix A6.
Most-divergent component: program score sits 25 points below the peer median (5 vs. 30).
5-year trend: Insufficient Data
Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.
Overall score has gone from 50 → 41 over 2 years (declining by 9 points).
What's driving this score
- All-volunteer org with no paid officers — governance signal is neutral (default 50), not absent.
What would change this score
No specific high-impact levers identified — this org's score is balanced across components.
Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.