Insufficient Data
At least 3 years of filing history are required to project a trajectory.
Insufficient Data Market Archetype Mechanical Natural
Tier
Priority Review
Trajectory Thumbprint

Insufficient Data

What does this mean?

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

Institutional Health Scores
Overall
26
Score
Governance
42
Score
Financial
0
Score
Program
45
Score

Institutional Epochs

2022
2023
2024
Financial Era
Governance Era
Trajectory Era
Insufficient Data

Historical Performance

Year Revenue Top Comp Comp % Rev Score Phase Label Outlook Details
2025 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2024 Hidden Hidden — — Unknown —
2023 — — 39.9% 26 Critical Intervention Needed Stable Watch

Officer compensation history

Tax year 2026

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIMBERLEY AHRENS Artistic Director 26.3% of Rev
CLAIRE WORRALL Executive Dir. 15.2% of Rev
DAVID KRAUSE Chairman —
MELINDA COTTEN Secretary —
WILLIAM MONTGOMERY Treasurer —
CYNTHIA NOTT Board Member —
RAVI GOPAL Board Member —
JOSEPH LO Board Member —
WILLIAM M SHEAFFER Board Member —
DAVID STANLEY Board Member —
TAMARA SUMMERS Board Member —

Tax year 2025

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
KIMBERLEY AHRENS Artistic Director 21.6% of Rev
MIGUEL CANTU-THRU 524 Executive Dir. 9.9% of Rev
CLAIRE WORRALL-FROM 524 GENERAL MANAGER 8.4% of Rev
DAVID KRAUSE Chairman —
MELINDA COTTEN Secretary —
WILLIAM MONTGOMERY Treasurer —
CYNTHIA NOTT Board Member —
RAVI GOPAL Board Member —

Tax year 2023

Name Title Phone Email Compensation
Melinda Cotton Secretary —
David Krause Board President —
Cynthia Nott Board Member —
William Montogomery Treasurer —
Ravi Gopal Board Member —
Officer contact details, exact compensation figures, and active litigation are available to verified members.
Request access
Score breakdown

Score breakdown

Financial resilience
0 / 100
weight 40%
Governance risk
42 / 100
weight 40%
Program scale
45 / 100
weight 20%
Overall
26 / 100
Priority Review

The three components combine into a single 0–100 score weighted as shown. Full methodology →

Peer comparison

Compared to 483 other orgs in TX with NTEE prefix A6.

Most-divergent component: financial score sits 67 points below the peer median (0 vs. 67).

5-year trend: Insufficient Data

Not enough historical data to determine a longitudinal pattern.

What's driving this score

What would change this score

The two changes that would most improve this score:

  1. Reduce top-officer compensation from 39.9% to under 22% of revenue — would move governance score by ~36 points.
  2. Separate signing authority from fundraising authority when both are held by one person — removes the concentration penalty (~12 points).

Improving governance is a board decision. These are the levers.